Well if we want to really go into constitutional interp, the military has no power to remove a sitting president.

But if elections do not occur a person doesn’t continue to be the president, additionally a 3rd term is banned by the constitution.

If Trump were to “cancel” elections, a power he doesn’t even have, the law is clear. He would still lose the presidency. It would then pass to the speaker of the house per the constitutional line of succession.

At that point the military would have a choice to make.

Of course these are big ifs, laws only matter if they are followed. And this scenario requires the law to be broken to even occur. Shits bad

I’d say the majority of the population can do that, mostly it’s a class filter. Need money to go to school or massive debt.

I vote Quaker

A series of pipes and tubes mostly

Marginally yes they are, but it’s still more common in my experience that the woman changes their name more often than not.

It’s a bit of paperwork, but it does make things easier when you have the same last name. Until president asshat decided to disenfranchise people.

I’d say the important statistic is that more conservative women get married overall

“Well technically” is not a convincing or relevant arguement. Bugs are animals too. They don’t get human rights

If I recall that was just electronics no?

Like we’ve seen them use fire at hogwarts. Simple chemical reactions still occur. That’s all a gun is, a spark, gunpowder, and a tube. Frankly this is just potions class

That’s what they said.

I think it’s a bad faith arguement to equate human enslavement to cattle production. Yet here we are

You are right it is a newer adaptation, but one that was clearly advantageous to our species. There are not many evolutionary changes that occurred independently in 3-5 different populations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactase_persistence

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3048992/#%3A~%3Atext=Lactase+is+the+enzyme+responsible%2Ctrait+known+as+lactase+persistence.

So according to you slaves are animals, neat

Yes scavenging for meat is generally considered a very important part of human evolution. Our stomachs are particularly acidic when compared to other great apes. This is believed to have evolved due to a high consumption of scavenged meats.

You are right though plants generally did form a large portion of our and our ancestors diets.

Important to note that as our brain size increased it did correlate with increased meat consumption as well. This all goes into calorie densities, available nutrients, and evolutionary pressures.

Humans evolved to proccess dairy, not once, not twice, but 3 times. Some studies even suggest up to 5 times.

Seems like it was definitely advantageous to consume dairy

There’s no evidence to support that. Best evidence is that our ancestors for the longest time were likely opportunistic omnivores. Plants of course were a large part of the diet, but looking back to about 3.9 mya meat was on the menu.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis

Wow, comparing actual human slavery to cattle production. That’s certainly a take

What’s the difference

The government?

So do hunting licenses in the US. Wildlife enforcement has some of the most authority in the state.

The issue is the states allow inherently unsafe munitions to be used. If they changed hunters in the US would comply

What are you even talking about? There are plenty of people that hunt even here in Germany.

Americans don’t have a monopoly on hunting.

Perhaps you are thinking of contract in too grand a scale, any basic employment agreement stating your hours and company rules is a contract.

Employment contracts are extremely rare or non-existent in the US.

Not at all, very common for salary positions