FTC chairman’s comments sound reasonable on the surface, but just vague enough to be meaningless.

It sounds to me like the “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” argument, but a first draft attempt to put AI issues away from the tool. Then, his definition of ‘developer’ is unclear.

With guns the argument is more straightforward, the tool is made to send projectiles in one direction when a user pulls the trigger.

With AI, does the end user know what the tool is capable of doing to achieve their goal when they direct it to do something?

Correct. 2/3 of the Senate present required to remove.

At least it’s a start. His boss is ultimately responsible, but it’s better than nothing if they succeed.

Simple, that’s their sugar daddy.

https://media.npr.org/documents/about/annualreports/NPR Annual Report 2025 mobile.pdf

Corporate sponsors starting on page 59, some other notable names starting on on page 38.

Other clues spread throughout, as to who they have to please to stay funded, and in business.

I’m doing my part!

They weren’t building those ‘detention centers’ for the immigrants. That’s a convenient cover until they’ve captured every lever of power. Within reach, or they’ll make it so before or when elections don’t go their way, if those still matter. Dissent is terror.