• DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Until they get people comfortable with that. Then it’ll be porn that’s deemed “degrading” or depictions of BDSM, or whatever they think they can sell you next. People who want to stop porn want to stop all porn. People who aren’t religious psychos who fall for this kind of bullshit aren’t really better than the religious psychos in any practical sense.

    Signed, A guy who hates step porn, and is really pissed off to have to defend it.

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly they all kinda missed the boat when it comes to the “morality” vote, Boomers are dieing and Gen X while still having a lot of folks who want to be just like their parents, isn’t as big a voting block. As for the newer generations studies show that they hold on to liberal ideas longer then previous generations and morality in the biblical sence isn’t as important. Sure some shit will get passed, but I honestly feel they are in their death throws, (some things take a while to die and can fuck shit up in the process) I think this is why they seem to be more openly embracing the incel community, they need voters to replace the Boomers, on a side note this is also why I believe the LDS church seems to be backing the “tradwife” influencers, but that is mostly conjecture.

    • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is why this sort of useless regulation is genius. No one is going to sign a petition to protect step-porn. Since it would permanently exist in a public archive, our great, great, great grandchildren would think we were freaks. “We don’t know much about great uncle Johnathan, but he liked watching step-siblings fuck.”

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is why this sort of useless regulation is genius. No one is going to sign a petition to protect step-porn

        It’s about AGE, not step porn exclusively. Opposing this is support for pedophilia.

        • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No. Pedophillia and porn involving minirs is already illegal. This is about normalizing morality police.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Opposing this isn’t defending step porn - it’s opposing illegalizing using minors in porn.

      If it were actually about banning some kind of consensual porn between adults, then you’d be defending step porn by opposing it.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Opposing this is about opposing the normalization of porn bans. Making porn with kids is already illegal most everywhere, and making porn where someone pretends to be a kid is already illegal in the UK.

        Defending this is defending backdoor theocracy.

        Side note: dibs on Backdoor Theocracy as a band name…