• railway692@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not theft. It’s copying or copyright infringement.

    If it was theft, the owners wouldn’t have it anymore.

    The words matter because they change your moral intuition about it.

  • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dodgy boxes have been a massive thing here, and there’s so much fearmongering in the news about how they’ll steal your internet, bank details and firstborn child, when they’re literally just amazon firesticks with some apks on them.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It would be nice if I could know how to use these services without some “box” or “app”

    • klu9@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article explains that the key services are tied to the hardware & probably controlled (with an attempt at plausible deniability) by the hardware vendors.

      Guess someone now needs to come up with a a way to pirate these pirate services 😁

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, it feels like a “loose lips sink ships” situation… But on the other side of the same coin, there’s no way the TV providers were ignorant of this. They undoubtedly already knew, so it’s not like this article is going to bring anything new to light. If anything, it may put a target on the backs of some of the people who were quoted in the article for litigation, but that’s not going to actually stop the boxes from being sold in the long term.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Way ahead of you here. Stopped watching TV entirely in the early 1990s.