• TheGoldenV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Counter to what you’ve heard? Like it’s the light car traffic doing the damage?

    Edit: To clarify- when I say damage I mean to the roadway surface and not the surrounding infrastructure.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Even the surrounding infrastructure.

      Cars are designed to take the damage of a crash and dissipate the energy, transport trucks aren’t. Then there’s the momentum issue.

      One truck crashing into a bridge is way more damage than a bunch of cars.

    • Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah, each individual car may not cause as much wear, but the sheer number of cars and light trucks causes most of the damage overall. I suppose it would still make sense to tax larger vehicles more heavily though, so I guess it still supports your conclusion, I just heard that the proportion of damage caused is way more than ~1% from just car traffic.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Doubt it. Stand on basically any street and count cars until you see a bus, big diesel truck, or a tractor-trailer come through, if you count less than 15000 cars, then the truck is doing more damage.