An account is an inanimate thing… you can’t accuse it of anything.
You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument.
Damn, it’s bros first comment after lurking nearly a year and this is what they get? Geeze it’ll probably be another year before they want to comment again.
Absolutely a real thing. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/-/media/files/allchildrens/clinical-pathways/chs_pathway-2025-08-18.pdf
https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(24)00127-6/
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2824833
https://gastro.org/clinical-guidance/diagnosis-management-of-cannabinoid-hyperemesis-syndrome/
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21665-cannabis-hyperemesis-syndrome
Hmm very suspicious
Ah, yes, attack the person, ignore the data.
Can you explain how that’s an attack? Isn’t that just normal pointing out bots?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things
This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation
An account is an inanimate thing… you can’t accuse it of anything.
You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument.
That’s as classic ad-hominem as it gets.
Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA
Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources.
Damn, it’s bros first comment after lurking nearly a year and this is what they get? Geeze it’ll probably be another year before they want to comment again.
Oh don’t sweat it, “bro” is ChatGPT or Opus 4.7
Thank you for the high quality sources. Cleveland Clinic has been recommended to me multiple times by health care providers.
Thank you for not just posting “it is a thing!” But instead backing it up with sources.