Safari and Firefox change how big sites render based on the domain. TikTok, Netflix, Instagram… even SeatGuru. Chrome doesn’t. Why is that?

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tldr: the big sites only target functionality for chrome due to market share, and if the other browsers don’t want the shitty reputation, they have to do this

    • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I do have doubt your explanation, but it’s tragic and backwards. It would make sense that a WordPress recipe blog wouldn’t be developed with smaller browsers in mind. But 5% of Instagram’s traffic is a gigantic amount of traffic, worth catering to. Wouldn’t it be the big websites that have both the budget and the motivation to make their sites work across browsers?

      Call me a luddite, but I think if I were the website director I’d be saying “If you have to do something special to make it work in Browser X vs Browser Y, you’re getting too fancy, you don’t need that crap.”

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I worked in software development. There are browsers that are tested, and “recommended” and ones that are left to rot. the bigger a company is, the less they give a shit

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And they usually don’t really give a shit in the first place about the website at all, the primary target is the app.

  • Kissaki@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Publisher targets 85% Chrome, other browsers send Chrome user agent as a workaround, Publisher now sees 95% Chrome. 🫠