Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 1 year agotechfeddit.orgimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagetechfeddit.orgHofmaimaier@feddit.org to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 1 year agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareunmagical@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoPretty sure the “Yikes” was because the number was obviously not arbitrary and the tech reporter didn’t know that. If it were truly an arbitrary number it likely wouldn’t warrant a “yikes.”
minus-square🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago…what? Lol Say the chat size increased to 317. Why would the tech writer say “yikes”? Just because it’s not divisible by 5 or 10?
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThe tech writer didn’t say yikes. The first person to post it did, then someone else reposted while keeping the original poster’s reaction.
minus-square🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoAh yeah I see that now. Still a bizarre reaction from the randim tumblr user, but that’s just typical tumblr stuff.
minus-squareAjen@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI had the same reaction, because someone who doesn’t understand the significance of the number 256 isn’t qualified to be a tech journalist.
minus-squareLotrOrc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI think the person youre responding to completely missed the entire point of the post tbh
Pretty sure the “Yikes” was because the number was obviously not arbitrary and the tech reporter didn’t know that.
If it were truly an arbitrary number it likely wouldn’t warrant a “yikes.”
…what? Lol
Say the chat size increased to 317. Why would the tech writer say “yikes”? Just because it’s not divisible by 5 or 10?
The tech writer didn’t say yikes. The first person to post it did, then someone else reposted while keeping the original poster’s reaction.
Ah yeah I see that now. Still a bizarre reaction from the randim tumblr user, but that’s just typical tumblr stuff.
I had the same reaction, because someone who doesn’t understand the significance of the number 256 isn’t qualified to be a tech journalist.
I think the person youre responding to completely missed the entire point of the post tbh