• FatVegan@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I don’t really get it to be honest. It’s pretty pointless if you don’t want room temperature coffee, or no.

    • tabris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      They’re talking about commercial scale coffee products and coffee flavoured products (bottled coffee drinks, instant coffee, etc.), where a reduction of 75% of the energy consumption could not only be very profitable, but also helpful in hitting environmental targets. Coffee is already a bit of an environmental nightmare when it comes to water usage in farming, so lessening the impact of commercial coffee is definitely a plus.

      • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        if all that energy is used to boil water and we’re cutting that energy use by 3/4 then it’s saving 70Wh (not kWh) per litre, or 70kWh per cubic meter. that’s not much

        • tabris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          When you’re dealing with thousands of litres per hour, it’s a fair amount.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Better. Perfect would be using chilled water. I’m on a limited connection right now so I can’t investigate, but I’m curious to know if they tested.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      You can heat the water afterwards. A lot of the heat in the hot water is lost in the beans. This might never have an application at your local coffee shop, but for canned coffee it will make a dramatic difference in profitability.