Interesting. What confuses me is 1) why JPEG artifacting would bastardize the word “JUICE” but leave “LOVE” totally legible and 2) why the star pattern is different on her t-shirt (i.e. there are way more and way darker). But the rest of the image even down to the grass pattern checks out. Odd.
I hate the AI conspiracy brained. Every image is generated to people like you, and it has to be proven otherwise, and even that isn’t enough. How would a generative model create this shirt so accurately, but then mess something up like just the pattern of the stars? If it were generated, there would be so many differences. It’s obviously not, but it is likely upscale or “enhanced”.
Sure, we should call out AI slop, but we can also be reasonable and stop. We don’t have to keep digging once it’s all figured out.
Nah. It’s definitely AI. 1: the text on the ketchup bottle 2: the hand holding (one is holding the others nub) 3: the mustard on the dog is wrong. Art is intentional, an artist would not have done these things. (I’m a pro)
Scroll down on the above site to solve the star conundrum. (There are multiple styles of the image to choose from.)
There may be multiple levels of AI involved. The original design may have been stolen from the site and had the original watermark removed with AI. When it was enhanced by the camera, the original corrections to the image caused the enhancement to become distorted. (As what happens when an image is ran through AI multiple times. Who knows how many times images on the interwebs now have been processed multiple times? It’s the modern version of a picture getting “jpeg’d” into oblivion.)
Or, the only thing AI in the picture from OP is the design with the watermark removed and placed on the shirt itself. That could cause the distortion and also pass AI detection tests if done correctly.
My final guess is also my first. It’s just simply broken photo enhancement. A picture like that would still have a dark foreground, even with a flash, due to the stage lighting in the background. (What I am saying is there is a high probability of an AI corrected picture that originally had a long exposure time. That is absolutely a condition that needs photo correction.)
tl:dr: the photo was originally too dark and “juice” was slopped-in by default.
Interesting. What confuses me is 1) why JPEG artifacting would bastardize the word “JUICE” but leave “LOVE” totally legible and 2) why the star pattern is different on her t-shirt (i.e. there are way more and way darker). But the rest of the image even down to the grass pattern checks out. Odd.
I hate the AI conspiracy brained. Every image is generated to people like you, and it has to be proven otherwise, and even that isn’t enough. How would a generative model create this shirt so accurately, but then mess something up like just the pattern of the stars? If it were generated, there would be so many differences. It’s obviously not, but it is likely upscale or “enhanced”.
Sure, we should call out AI slop, but we can also be reasonable and stop. We don’t have to keep digging once it’s all figured out.
Nah. It’s definitely AI. 1: the text on the ketchup bottle 2: the hand holding (one is holding the others nub) 3: the mustard on the dog is wrong. Art is intentional, an artist would not have done these things. (I’m a pro)
She’s got 1 rolled up short leg and the other is cut off, but they are the same length. Now I’m suspicious of the entire image.
Scroll down on the above site to solve the star conundrum. (There are multiple styles of the image to choose from.)
There may be multiple levels of AI involved. The original design may have been stolen from the site and had the original watermark removed with AI. When it was enhanced by the camera, the original corrections to the image caused the enhancement to become distorted. (As what happens when an image is ran through AI multiple times. Who knows how many times images on the interwebs now have been processed multiple times? It’s the modern version of a picture getting “jpeg’d” into oblivion.)
Or, the only thing AI in the picture from OP is the design with the watermark removed and placed on the shirt itself. That could cause the distortion and also pass AI detection tests if done correctly.
My final guess is also my first. It’s just simply broken photo enhancement. A picture like that would still have a dark foreground, even with a flash, due to the stage lighting in the background. (What I am saying is there is a high probability of an AI corrected picture that originally had a long exposure time. That is absolutely a condition that needs photo correction.)
tl:dr: the photo was originally too dark and “juice” was slopped-in by default.