• monotremata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They do very occasionally blunder into something that has merits. Like, they rescheduled marijuana, and they’re fast-tracking research on therapeutic psilocybin and MDMA. Those are positive things, broadly speaking. Removing the tax on tipped workers was also helpful for some working-class people.

    I can’t think of anything else off the top of my head, but part of that is probably availability bias: the vaguely positive stuff that they do is a lot less emotionally charged, and therefore less memorable, than the wildly awful stuff they also constantly do.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Removing the tax on tipped workers was also helpful for some working-class people.

      I’m much more cynical about this. Tipping has always been the most acceptable kind of tax fraud, that we all willingly participate in. I’m sure it’s changing as credit cards dominate, but tips paid in cash leave no record trail, no evidence that they ever existed. Why would wait staff be diligent about reporting it? At the same time, it’s small potatoes to the IRS, hardly worth trying to enforce. Why even bother?

      • uberfreeza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I also dont like it in general. mainly because as an ex-server i know most dont report at least a percentage of cash tips. and i assume the worst when it comes to businesses who will keep wages lower to advertise tips that are no longer taxed (up to a certain amount).

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      they rescheduled marijuana

      Half-assed it. How do you schedule the drug differently when it’s “medical” vs recreational? I don’t partake so it doesn’t affect me either way, but a lot of people like it for anxiety and to help calm the mind to sleep.

      How is it that a person in Massachusetts trying to calm their anxiety is using “drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”, but a person in Florida using it exactly the same is using “ as drugs with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence.”?

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s nothing new. There’s always be the good old
        “this chemical is known to the state of California to pose a cancer risk” as an example.