einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoNot a single onesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square135linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNot a single onesh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square135linkfedilink
minus-squareVibeSurgeon@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI don’t think anyone is arguing for the oil industry. Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind.
minus-squarebacon_pdp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoSolar and wind are nuclear powered. It is just very inefficiently being collected from the massive inefficient fusion reactor in the sky.
minus-squaretheunknownmuncher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind. Maybe true only at small scale.
I don’t think anyone is arguing for the oil industry.
Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind.
Solar and wind are nuclear powered. It is just very inefficiently being collected from the massive inefficient fusion reactor in the sky.
Maybe true only at small scale.