• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is why I treat it like a rental. When I was renting my deposit was 10 days of rent and I didn’t expect to get it back because I knew from someone else leaving that the landlord was a wanker.

    I started homebrewing when I lived there, had a batch explode and splatter honey water all across the room. I quickly learnt to avoid the patches of carpet that were sticky. Knowing that the landlord wouldn’t repay the deposit without me taking him to court anyway, I didn’t bother cleaning it up.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve been in the same place for over a decade, the deposit I’d like back but the place is kinda infamous for nickle and dime issues to keep as much as possible. Also the new management company have been sticklers for keeping things “clean” without saying what the standard is. I wipe up when I make a mess, sweep and mop when it’s worth my time. Still, they made a stink that I wasn’t perfect. So now I pour oil down the kitchen sink.

  • architectonas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes because rent is supposed to cover my investment costs as well as provide passive income. What do you mean my investment is bound to the property? This is only true when I sell it and cash out once again.

    Landlord 101

  • AmyAye@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok, but can I still flip the switch on and off rapidly pretending its a lightning storm.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lmao I literally spent $2 and 10 minutes replacing an outlet on my rental the other day to avoid having to deal with my landlord

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s illegal in my country.

    The only power a landlord has here is when people break stuff on purpose, cause actual disturbance or do not pay. Stuff like race, dogs, job and all that type discrimination is not allowed.

    • Griffus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      While pet ownership and any sort of discrimination is not allowed in Norway, renters here view in envy at our neighbours regulated renting markets, especially the lowlanders in Denmark. But what hurts the progression here the most right now, is that up to 80 % of adults own their homes, so regulating for the lower 20 % will never be a priority, since that might hurt most people.

  • Griffus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I’m too rich to afford providing your wealth grade a home, so I’d appreciate if we could grow more apart economically 😊”

  • Rahelno@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting take. Definining how much time one can spent in a rented property. I’m curious about the legal side of this.

    Could such a prevention in the Ad for the property be ignored?

    Could such a point in the contract be ignored as it would be invalid?

    • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It brings up the point of families where one parent works and the other is home with the kids (I know this is increasingly rare, but they still exist) or retired people, or people who are disabled, or many of the other situations where someone would be home all day but not working. Could they legally tell a mom who is recovering from a recent birth or someone who is temporarily off work because of major surgery hey GTFO of your home for 8 hours a day? Methinks not.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The principle already exists. Halfway-houses often have curfews: if you’re out of the house after X time without a valid excuse, you are in violation of your lease. There’s also 55+ communities: if you’re letting your 20-something kid crash with you, you’re in violation of your lease.

      As long as it’s not a protected status or violates local renting laws explicitly, a landlord can put just about anything they want in the lease agreement. If the tenant signed the agreement with those clauses, they’re obliged to abide by those clauses.

        • tmyakal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not exclusively. There are plenty that are run privately and/or partner with rehab clinics as the next step after in-patient detox.

          Yes, a lot of people can end up there as part of a sentencing agreement, but not all. I would be surprised if it was even most. And regardless of inciting circumstances, it’s still a living situation that is contingent on strict rules and guidelines that the tenant must agree to or face eviction. Which is exactly what we’re talking about: can a landlord dictate the conditions under which you’re allowed to stay? Yes, as long as it’s in writing, agreed to by both parties, and doesn’t violate any local, state, or federal laws.

          If you want a less extreme example, we can talk about a lease that stipulates no smoking inside. That’s a pretty standard clause these days in localities that allow it. Would we give it the same scrutiny and pushback? Probably not, because most people don’t smoke these days and that expectation has been normalized. Just because landlords haven’t gotten to normalize limited usage hours for a property yet doesn’t mean it’s illegal for them to try.

          TL;DR: If it’s not illegal, a lease can require anything both parties agree to. Not saying that is right, common, or economical to enforce, but it’s a thing that is true.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Smoking causes damage to the unit. Damage which costs the landlord a lot of money to fix, and it’ll never be fully purged.

            Working on your computer for 8 hours does not. It would be no different from staying home and playing games all day as far as the condition of the unit is concerned.

            They’re not even remotely comparable.

            • tmyakal@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              … did you even read the thread your responding to? The whole premise is a landlord making a value judgement on the additional 8 hours per day that may incur wear and tear on the property.

              And to be clear, I’m not arguing the validity of that position. I’m arguing the legality of that clause. It’s difficult to prove and likely prohibitively expensive to enforce, but not fundamentally illegal in much of the US. If the landlord puts it in the lease, and the tenant signs that lease, then the tenant better be prepared for argumentative bullshit from their landlord.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Halfway houses are for rehabilitation. A court allows you to live there with restrictions as opposed to locking you up. Even outside 55+ communities rentals can restrict other “tenants”. Those are vastly different scenarios, legally speaking, to restricting what the legal renter can do while simply living. As others have pointed out stay at home parents are a thing.