• ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oakland isn’t a total disaster and you have no comparison for the statement, just a will to say bad things about somewhere you’ve never been. Grow up, mature a bit, and learn how to be critical instead of hateful.

  • classic@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If they were concerned about speeding and not just an excuse for surveillance and money via fines, they’d install speed bumps

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems typical. But we can’t know without total traffic numbers to compare to. Is that 12k out of 1m, 100k, 20k?

  • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    As someone who lives near Oakland, I’d caution to take these figures with a grain of salt. There are definitely plenty of awful drivers, but there’s also a significant amount of anecdotal evidence from the community that a number of these cameras are miscalibrated. There’s one in particular that’s clearly within a posted 35MPH zone that snaps images of people going 25.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Case study in “Speed limit signs don’t set the speed drivers feel comfortable at, only suggest it.”

    Street design is critical.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Either that or they build the roads wrong for the speeds they actually wanted