You’re not alone with this assessment. And what’s more interesting…
“Many times the government wants to highlight what it was trying to investigate because that ups the stakes on what the defendant was doing,” Professor Richman said. “This is a case where I think they’re trying to avoid exactly that by focusing only on the destruction, and not what the investigation was about.”
They destroyed their own private information that might prove them guilty of a crime during an unreasonable search and seizure, therefore they’re guilty of a different crime.
A citizen not under arrest? How is that destroying evidence?
You’re not alone with this assessment. And what’s more interesting…
They destroyed their own private information that might prove them guilty of a crime during an unreasonable search and seizure, therefore they’re guilty of a different crime.
No entrapment at all.
/s in case it isn’t obvious.
Hopefully it goes in front a judge who sees this as the harassment it clearly is. Thanks for posting
Why do people talk this way?
It’s weird. Passive aggressive. Psychological issues?
Out of curiosity, what is weird about it?
Go read a book.
Which book?
How to win Friends and influence people by Dale Carnegie