In August 2025, two nearly identical lawsuits were filed: one against United (in San Francisco federal court) and one against Delta Air Lines (in Brooklyn federal court). They claim that each airline sold more than one million “window seats” on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321, many of which are next to blank fuselage walls rather than windows.

Passengers say they paid seat-selection fees (commonly $30 to $100+) expecting a view, sunlight, or the comfort of a genuine window seat — and say they would not have booked or paid extra had they known the seat lacked a window.

As reported by Reuters, United’s filing argues that it never promised a view when it used the label “window” for a seat. According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall, not a guarantee of an exterior view.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If the seat doesn’t include a window then it needs to be called a wall seat. This is an open and shut case of false advertising.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is a seat that is closest to the windows for the row. This is an open and shut case of common fucking sense

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not defending them, and don’t care. There are a bunch of self righteous people on here who think they’re coming up with a profound statement when it’s just common sense they need.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Every window used to have a window. Then airlines decided to cram more seats inside without adjusting the number of windows. Common sense says you change the fucking name of the thing you’re selling, because of course people are going to continue thinking of what used to be true as the reason, not some hamdisted attempt to argue your way out of liability for your lies.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        At one point in my career, they moved us to a long white room with no windows. (The reason this particular room on this floor did not have windows was that on the wall, where the windows normally would have been were large external letters on the outside of the building spelling out the original name of the building. So of course you couldn’t have windows behind the externally mounted letters.) And their attempt at making it bearable was to put giant vinyl stickers of somewhat cartoonish window scenes along the big long outside white wall. I did not enjoy working in that space.

  • AnitaAmandaHuginskis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “War is peace”

    That’s what they are trying to pull. Look it up.

    According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall

    Then call it “wall seat”

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s like trying to call the non runway parts of airports ramps, aprons and taxiways. Because technically none of it is made with tarmac anymore but the general population is too stupid to go back so now that’s what it’s all called.