but cable didn’t improve which is what the question asks for

you didn’t explicitly say anything we could go on either before yesterday’s reply

machine learning is AI

people only said suicide detection was a good use of AI, not crime surveillance. and nobody’s pretending stopping a suicide attempt treats the underlying issues either, and that’s still better than not stopping it

do you see how replying to “every city in WA except of Seattle doesn’t make it real easy to live without a car, and the city in the article is very much outside of Seattle” with “you can’t read, i was just talking about places that don’t need them” makes one think you’re saying that “the city in the article is not one of the places that don’t need them”?

can’t you just explain I’ve got no idea what you’re saying either

flippancy is just the progressive version of virtue signaling—it gets nobody else on your side

If you settle down for something as big as housing and will bring a car, you’ve hashed out where to park already. The true solution to environmental issues is a bike.

You have a point with most of these (I’ll concede on the ones I don’t mention) but East is not a freeway but a street with zebra crossings and a roundabout. North is not a residential neighborhood; Aria Apartments is the only residential I can see and the lot North of that is free.

And still, if you have enough money to get a car, you should have enough money for a jacket, a bike, and/or train tickets.

Giving people a place to live is more important than giving them a place to park, especially in a area with a bus system named North American Transit System of the Year.

once residential buildings go up, there won’t be anywhere to park

The pictured development includes a parking lot.

The development is also surrounded by parking lots.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ride_the_D

unfortunately “thrust” is the accurate aircraft term 😭

are these causing oversupply that could be reclaimed for other things?

the “amenities” eliminated are parking minimums, and you’re assuming that the parking minimums aren’t causing oversupply of unused parking lots. check out the very third photo in the article (the overhead view of a parking lot), its first example of a housing development benefiting from the change. notice how less than half of the spots and thus less than a quarter of the land was being used

These people will still own cars

not necessarily

It’s like drugs.

You can try it right now, actually.

see also Letterboxd for just reviews

it sounded more like simply asking the US Justice department to do a specific thing/voting into them doing the thing than changing anything about the system that makes spending possible

seems like a lot of work to do everything but organize a revolution

sauce?

the problem with that is Epstein did use em dashes in his emails, or at least double hyphens supposed to be em dashes