• 1 Post
  • 157 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 19th, 2025

help-circle



  • I’m sorry for your loss. That’s a heavy thing to deal with, and to go through it three times is pretty brutal.

    Suicide hotlines are still a thing. Exactly how they work and how to contact them will vary depending on your region. They’re almost certainly in need of more operators, and while I’m sure they’ll give you some advice for helping people going through it, I’m not sure what kind of experience you need to work or volunteer with them (again, that will vary with region).

    I will caution you that it’s an extremely difficult job. That’s not to dissuade you from going out to help people - but to help others you have to help yourself first so you need to be aware what kind of toll that work can have on people.

    Regarding my own suicidality and with men in particular there comes a fear of vulnerability. Suicide is one of the heaviest, most personal things a person can go through. Oftentimes our culture, or upbringing, or gender norms prevent people from opening up emotionally. Suicide is taboo and the suicidal often struggle with feelings of guilt, and talking about it brings in a fear of rejection or ridicule.

    The advice I can offer is to try and foster an environment where people can open up to you judgment-free. If you’re willing to be vulnerable around others that sets an example that they can be vulnerable around you. Hearing about suicide is also an upsetting thing, and if you have a history with several victims you might naturally be upset to hear someone is considering it a fourth time. If your feelings are explosive, try to rein them in - an outburst likely means they won’t open up to you again.

    Because the fear of opening up is real, it might be difficult to recognize the warning signs. This isn’t a failure on your part, the victim is literally hiding it from everyone. Most people expect the suicidal to be depressed, but people will often socially mask their feelings by overcompensating with an appearance of happiness. However, if there is someone who you fear is considering suicide and is outwardly depressed, and then one day out of the blue they’re suddenly fine - that can be a signal they’ve decided to end their life which somewhat paradoxically brings about a feeling of peace. In either case, when somebody starts giving away treasured possessions (sentimental, expensive, or things they use every day), that’s a pretty clear warning.

    I’d also advise you to check out some resources online. There are associations for suicide prevention and mental health in general that have some fantastic resources available to the general public. While not specifically what you asked for, here is a toolkit for people who have lost someone to suicide.


    There is one more thing I’d like to add. It might be upsetting, but its intent is to give you peace of mind: you can’t help everyone. That’s not a cop-out or callousness either. In psychiatry there is a concept of resistance which implies a couple things.

    First, a patient is likely to resist any psychiatric intervention - therapy is difficult, it can hurt you emotionally, and the patient’s disordered behaviour is often a coping mechanism that they’ve learned to deal with their life - even if they want to be fixed they might not want to lose their coping methods or lifestyle.

    Second, a therapist is unable to help a patient that does not want to help themselves. You can try every trick in the book, but if they’re really not into it then there’s no way to help them. That’s not a personal failing on the therapist’s part. Now technically in the case of suicide you might be able to point to how a doctor can force someone into a hospital if they’re at imminent risk of suicide - but stripping someone of their autonomy and pumping them full of drugs until the danger passes is the exact kind of behaviour that would prevent someone from opening up again.

    I am really sorry you’re going through it. Don’t beat yourself up, and try to remember them as they were before they got sick



  • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zonetome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    “Hot Girl Summer” was something of a meme and then became a chart-topping song for a while. It’s a cultural movement that promotes self respect, body positivity, stuff like that.

    “Hot Girl Suffer” is a little bit of wordplay that sounds like it’s the opposite






  • I’m not an expert, but from personal experience I would hazard it’s mostly due to not having time to cook. And perhaps more than not having time, it’s not having the energy.

    After work, I don’t want to cook. I might be physically exhausted from my job, or cognitively drained from dealing with bullshit. Some people work several jobs, some people have hours-long commutes. Then there’s obligations like childcare, family, or maintaining your social life. So some people literally don’t have enough hours in the day, and for others although there are technically enough hours, the time must be spent on recharging your batteries.

    Some people recommend batch cooking and meal prep to counter this, but I personally find it untenable. It’s challenging to find the will to make a single meal, making one that’s five times larger is an ordeal. Add to it that I don’t really want to eat the same thing every day, and it’s a tough nut to crack.

    There are almost certainly people who don’t know how to cook. Public education has been gutted in the US, so to learn cooking you probably have to rely on either your parents teaching you, or having the motivation to learn it yourself. If your parents are also struggling to find the time to cook, they probably don’t have the time to teach you either. Self-taught learning can be a crapshoot for most people: it can be too open-ended to know where to start, or discouraging when you fall into a newbie pitfall, or you focus on the wrong things.

    That’s not to say it can’t be done. Self-teaching is a valuable skill that will take you far, but perhaps ironically, you have to learn how to do it yourself. Partly due to its nature, and also see above where public education has been gutted.

    As for it being cheaper: maybe, but not likely. Some meals it might become cheaper to purchase that way due to economies of scale in processing, but it’s almost certainly going to be cheaper to buy the raw ingredients yourself. Exceptions might apply for stale-dated food: something that the grocer was going to discard but gave it a second life by processing means they might be able to afford to lower the price. If you’re not picky about what you’re eating, a ready-made meal that’s about to expire will probably be discounted. I still don’t think it would be cheaper than buying ingredients, but it’s definitely cheaper than a restaurant.

    One thing not mentioned is access to equipment. I don’t have a rotisserie or a deep fryer. Some people might not have a full size oven, or are forced to do most of their cooking on a hot plate. Still others might not have access to a kitchen at all.


  • I’m often annoyed by this too because a screenshot doesn’t really prove anything, but the name of the article and the website are included in the screenshot

    Just a web search away

    Article text

    Configuration settings were modified “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur”.

    Meta claimed in a court filing this week that despite torrenting an 82 TB dataset of pirated, copyrighted material from shadow libraries to train its LLaMA AI models, that employees “took precautions not to “seed” any downloaded files”.

    The act of Seeding in torrenting terminology refers to sharing a file with other users during, (or commonly after) downloading it. Since torrenting is a peer-to-peer system, every user downloading a file can also upload parts of it to other users.

    Meta’s lawyers claim that there are “no facts to show that Meta seeded Plaintiffs’ books”. This means that the company’s defense is pinning hopes on the fact that there isn’t currently any proof that Meta shared the material during the torrenting process.

    Though Meta claims that there is no evidence of seeding, Michael Clark, an executive at Meta in charge of project management testified that the configuration settings they were using were modified “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur”.

    Following this statement, a question regarding why Meta chose to minimize seeding was asked, attorney-client privilege was invoked so that Clark could not answer. Interestingly, the statement issued by Clark shows that Meta sought methods to minimize seeding, but has yet to offer up indication that it entirely prevented seeding copyrighted material.

    Additionally, an internal message from Frank Zhang, a Meta researcher, could point toward alleged concealment of potential seeding from Meta’s servers, to avoid “risk of tracing back the seeder/downloader” to Facebook servers.

    Meta’s defense seems to hinge around the lack of evidence around not sharing the large amount of data they have allegedly downloaded to train its AI models. Should Meta win on this defense and prove that downloading copyrighted content isn’t illegal, but distribution is, it could shake up future cases of piracy and unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content.

    The defense relying on torrenting terminology could also a way for Meta to aim in tripping up courts. Focusing on seeding could further muddy the claim that Meta allegedly knew that it was violating laws by torrenting copyrighted material.

    Meta has yet to respond to claims surrounding on whether it knew that it was sharing data during the download process.

    Authors allege Meta was “knowing participant” in “illegal peer-to-peer piracy network”

    Authors of the copyrighted material alleged to have been obtained by Meta without prior licensing agreements have alleged [PDF] that “Meta’s decision to bypass lawful acquisition methods and become a knowing participant in an illegal peer-to-peer piracy network”.

    With the court battle expected to continue, no final decision around the case has been made. Even following a final decision, it’s expected that Meta will attempt to appeal the decision if they were to lose, meaning that final judgements could be a long while away.

    But, similar cases do exist. OpenAI was sued by novelists in 2023, with the New York Times also suing OpenAI and Microsoft over “millions” copied news articles. As the long list of LLM-related litigation continues, this is likely not going to be the last we hear from Meta’s specific case.

    I’m beginning to think that these Facebook people are kinda lame