1: Trump got the Majority vote, so in this case the point is invalid. As democracy actually prevailed.
2: Nope that’s the rules, if you don’t participate in elections, your complaints about the results are void.

Of course in USA that doesn’t have a functional democracy, you can complain if you are not allowed to vote, for instance for being caught with a joint in the 70’s. In a real democracy criminals can vote too. Removing your right to vote because of arbitrary laws that criminalizes behavior that is typical for a demographic you are oppressing is not democracy.

We thank you for your sacrifice, distracting from the Epstein files and the failing economy.

1: There are no signs of that.
2: If you don’t vote, you don’t get a right to complain.

Included this as an edit to my comment above instead.

Country of sycophants.

Edit:
To those that downvote, this is not just the officer, it is also his colleagues that URGED the ambulance to take the officer instead. And finally the ambulance people should CLEARLY have deemed it more important to take the gunshot victim, which the ambulance was called for! This makes it a bad decission not by 1 person, but by at least 5 people who agreed on this insane unprofessional decision all around.

But this anecdote is of course not the reason for my comment, it is everything about American society, American society is based on psychopathy, which is the reason Trump was able to win twice. How could Trump win the election twice unless people were fine with his obvious malignant narcissism.
And if you say it isn’t obvious, it’s because you suffer the same problem. Because IT IS FUCKING OBVIOUS to any normal person.

Now you are making zero sense, since the OP joke was clearly derogatory.

I suspect so, half is only what is official and that we know of, but those assholes are infamous for hiding wealth in tax shelters.

Is the national average negative?

Maybe if you exclude the 1%, who probably hold half the retirement savings, but obviously are vastly in plus on the total.

Thanks, excellent perspective. 👍

Everyone includes minorities. So maybe you should have excluded that instead of using such broad strokes.

People like you?

Yes. I don’t see how that could be offensive, because I don’t think anybody identify as humorless idiots. So go right ahead.
There’s a huge difference between targeting a demographic that exist and one that kind of doesn’t really.
But apparently you don’t have the intellectual capacity to understand that.
Obviously I don’t identify as a humorless idiot. I even noted the drawings are kind of funny, it’s the joke that isn’t.

I just tried a banana, it exceeded my expectations.

Of course I can, it follows logically from your opposition to my post questioning it.
It is also logically in line with the fact that you suggest “librarian” as a better example than “foreigner”.
Thinking those 2 posts make sense and are OK, but the examples I gave you consider sociopathic, shows you can’t really distinguish between what is OK and what is not.
That is actually a pretty strong symptom!

you have no idea who I am.

I know what you wrote, and my response is based on that.
You obviously think it’s OK to make fun of people for being Vegan, and think it’s OK to make fun of people for other reasons too, like being a librarian.
That clearly makes you “insensitive”, but being “insensitive” is a personal trait that has an underlying cause, and is typical for for instance sociopaths and psychopaths and narcissists.
But you are right I can’t diagnose you as such, bu I can for sure conclude you have a trait that is common for all those 3.
So maybe you should consider why you think it’s OK to behave in a way, that makes you look like that?
Try to image the situation where Trump made fun of a handicapped journalist, is that who you want to be?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-s-worst-offense-mocking-disabled-reporter-poll-finds-n627736

Unhinged from what?
Just because you won’t accept who you really are?
If it hurts your feefees too much, we can call it “very insensitive”. But it boils down to the same thing.

I could, but those examples are not equivalent except for librarians.
Nobody calls themselves hipster or beer snob.

That is not reasoning, but examples of other groups people make fun of.
You are failing basic logic.

I think that is spot on the main issue here.
But everybody needs to be able to accept they are not flawless, because nobody is.

OK what are these other groups? Redheads, handicapped, foreigners, women?

What are these groups that should be made fun of?
You are reasoning like a true sociopath.