In order to “incentivize” age verification, The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced that they will ignore COPPA violations for software performing age verification.
COPPA prevents companies from collecting data on minors without parental consent.
Sounds like the Epstein Class is still in charge of the FTC.
No it’s the “Baht Room”. Like you’ve been Baht. You need to be punished. *wtsh *wtsh
AI overview immediately makes me think you’re posting in bad faith.
I’m literally just agreeing with the guy saying this is a bad use of statistics. Glad to see the reddit hive mind is alive and well.
So if I hadn’t been honest you would have trusted me? Very telling hive mind mfer
Absolve? lmfao hive mind idiots. No wonder Americans let this happen to themselves.
You replied to me and are defending OP so don’t complain that i’m throwing salt at your math skills.
The fact that your NOT op makes it worse. Means I nailed it with the hive mind accusation.
You defs missed the part about getting the right answer with the wrong math. I’m not arguing that police aren’t deadlier than shooters. I’m pointing out the math he used to back it up is bullshit.
Buddy ACAB all the way. But you and everyone upvoting you are shit at math. Hive mind af.
police in america is 33 times deadlier than mass shooters.
AI Overview Estimates of mass shooters in U.S. history vary widely based on definitions, with studies identifying roughly 172 to 298 “public mass shooters” between 1966 and 2024.
As of 2023, there were approximately 720,652 law enforcement officers in the United States, according to Statista.
Yea you’re just bad at statistics. Which is not mutually exclusive with ACAB btw.
Like this is the reason math teachers don’t accept just the answer. One can arrive at the correct answer while still being terrible at math.
link, please
You’re thinking about Sir Wilfred Sausage IIRC
Oh I can tell you’ve been looking for transphobia anywhere you can find it for a decade. It’s obvious.
You just keep confirming that you care more about having a label than about people being able to express their gender identity freely.
Believe it or not, you don’t speak for everyone who isn’t cis.
Totally understandable that you as a trans woman would need to be vigilant for transphobia. But you find what you look for and right now your transphobia alarm is giving you a false positive here.
Cuz that is not what buddy said, at all.
Sounds like you care more about having the trans label than people actually being free to express themselves.
The fact that you have to define yourself as conforming or non-conforming is what’s being griped here.
Dude literally is saying that you, as a woman, shouldn’t have to conform to feminine stereotypes that you don’t intrinsically want to conform to.
“The content isn’t available in your region”
“Please insert your testicles into the crushing receptacle and pay 14.99”
Yes, pirate is better
Went to visit the parents. Still got the official Pirate Bay sticker on my old bedroom door. Dat nostalgia.
I’m from Western Canada and while our experience is very very far from the rest of NA’s…(none of our shit came from Mexico) one thing that’s definitely changed over the last few decades is the knowledge base of cannabis growers in general.
There are more cannabis specific products such as nutrient blends, pest, and environmental controls. Off the shelf products you can order online that used to be custom made or end you up on a list.
People understand pruning, topping, and branch lining. This becomes especially apparent when you compare amateur growers to intermediate and medical grade growers.
Than there’s the genetics being improved through breeding. .
But the main thing I’m told is that a lot of weed in the USA came from outdoor grows in Mexico. Which outdoor can never, ever, compete with indoor.
I didn’t know they’d been working on this shit like it’s the cure for cancer
First off because I’m not disagreeing with his thesis. I’m agreeing with the commentor, who also neglected to disagree with his thesis, who said his use of statistics were flawed.
As to your first question.
He’s comparing total deaths from shooters and police.
But if you add up the total number of individuals that have committed mass shootings it’s gonna total like what 1000? 2000?
Meanwhile there’s at minimum 700,000 police officers in the USA right now (not including ICE-PIGS).
So his number of 33x more deadly is not accurate, because if the USA had even half as many mass shooters as police the death toll from mass shooters would clearly be larger.
Hence why it’s a bad use of statistics.
…
American’s culture of anti-intellectualism is one of the tools the elites use to control the populace. If we can’t even have an adult conversation about math than how are we going to unite against our oppressors?