Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.
Why doesn’t it work in those contexts? It’s better than nothing in those contexts too. I’d rather have a car with onboard intelligence to take over than an uncontrolled one.
I think you’re letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, here. There are plenty of situations where you don’t need a robot to behave perfectly. People don’t behave perfectly.
To what tasks could you set a bot that does stuff with minimal competence let’s say 90% of the time, and the other 10%, doesn’t create even bigger problems?
Sounds like a typical human to me.
A chip like this would be perfect for an autonomous robot. Drone, humanoid, whatever - something that still needs to be able to handle itself when it’s cut off from outside control. Always nice to have an internet connection to draw on a bigger, more capable “brain” somewhere else, but if that connection is lost you want it to be able to carry on with whatever it’s doing and not just flop over limply.
Two more completely disconnected statements that are presented as if there was something meaningful connecting them, is this intentional irony?
Case in point: the inability to tell the difference between correlation and causation.
If you’re not investing anything in anything then this really isn’t your problem.
The companies that continue with human staff where others are replacing theirs, for example. Outsourcers providing those staff.
But don’t you see? We don’t like these particular people, so they should suffer the maximum possible penalties under every circumstance.
If we liked them then punishing them for wearing glasses would of course be a travesty.
Depends entirely on the circumstances of where it does end up being built. I’m not sure what “gotcha” you think you’re making here? That Reddit comment is just me pointing out that when a business uses electricity they pay for it.
So it’ll be built somewhere else. Data moves around quite easily.
Where’s this infinite well of investment money coming from? “Economic magic” is pretty vague.
Then invest in competitors, they’ve got a more flexible timeframe.
So what’s the problem? This looks self-correcting to me, if none of the AI companies are profitable then they’re going to go away. Short their stock and make a fortune.
It’s been darkly amusing watching the various social media hive-minds that used to be all for the concept of “information wanting to be free” suddenly discovering that they hate AI more than they love freedom of information.
Both. I don’t see any “mechanical” action like this as likely to be useful. Probably easier for a posting bot to remember to do than a human.
Edit: It’s funny when comments like this get downvoted. The downvoting isn’t going to change how easy it is for bots to add alt text when posting. Is ignoring their capabilities going to help combat them?
A pretty straightforward thing for a bot to do, I would think.
I have no idea what you’re thinking the scenario is here. The alternative is an uncontrolled car, I think I’d rather it had at least some brains behind the decisions it’s making.