So the taxi isn’t just a random choice, it’s from the original image. This meme is a work of art. 9/11.

I’m unintentionally the social version of that

Also I just … don’t like statues literally at all. I know I’m weird for this take (it’s not a take, really a preference), but like … why build a statue when you can build something functional or actually pretty? (Also I just realized your profile picture is a statue so don’t take it personally 😆.)

They are speedrunning radicalization of the masses against capitalism

You: this sucks actually

I mean I fuck with the literal message, but … I am literally incapable of suspending my disbelief when it comes to the words of and . If someone other than and did it then I’d fuck with it (unless they’re monsters of the same order as and ).

Bad take my guy but its okay we all got 'em

I mean I can eat that 😆. If we all gotta have at least one shitty take, at least mine’s over some goofy statue and not something serious

I appreciate your charity, but actually the Statue of Liberty is Fr*nch and therefore trash. Also it’s really tiny in the context of New York Harbor and all the surrounding buildings.

But then doesn’t that also defeat the meme? Is IVF “totally inappropriate”?

This is the main french Lemmy instance using a luxembourg domain.

Excellent. Unfortunately I don’t have a burning Luxembourg flag on hand, but thankfully I can now respond with a burning flag emoji. So fuck Fr*nce and their settler-colonialist laws too. 💩

Who the fuck are you to decide who gets to live or die ?

Why don’t you apply that exact same indignation to the State?

Also I guess killing in self-defense isn’t a thing? Because the capitalists attack us, all of us, the whole goddamn planet, every hour of every day with their destruction.

Also also, the exact point I’m making is that you don’t have to kill people to participate in a revolution.

Everything else

: “I literally cannot tell the difference between PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S and Charlie Kirk.”

In my country, your comment would be illegal.

Which as an anarchist means I’m doing something right

I dont care what your ideology is. I do see your wish for violence and extra-judicial killings and it disgusts me.

Counterpoint: judicial killings are just extra-judicial killings with extra steps.

I wish for the minimum possible amount of violence in the transition to anarchy. It’s not my goddamn fault that the capitalists are so fucking vile that they won’t let us do this without violence.

So many criminals against humanity thought they were doing their massacres for a good fight, that it was necessary. You are just the same.

: “I want to destroy everyone and everything that isn’t profitable.”

: “I’m willing to use violence to stop them.”

: “I literally cannot tell the difference.”

I wish you could express your ideas without the need to encourage violence.

Yeah and I wish the capitalists didn’t constantly deploy the fucking militaries and police of the world to constantly destroy people and subjugate the masses, and people in Hell want ice water. We’re gonna have to fight these fuckers. Tough shit.

I find even more pathetic that you encourage others to do the violence for you.

Because we can’t do this shit alone.

PS : you can be a revolutionary without being violent.

Yes that is exactly my point. You don’t personally have to be violent to contribute to a revolution. You just need to learn to collaborate with the people who are willing to do violence. I support a diversity of tactics…but sometimes, we gotta fight.

Actually, the Internet does not mean wires. It is the global computer network that uses the Internet protocol suite to communicate. The medium of the connection (e.g., wireless, copper wires, fiber optic, etc.) is mostly irrelevant.

As for your phone, it communicates with the rest of the Internet wirelessly, i.e. by sending and receiving electromagnetic waves through the air. The details depend on whether your phone is using mobile data or WiFi. Your phone gets connected to the Internet because it has the required hardware (wireless transceiver, embedded computer), software (web browser (e.g. Firefox, Chrome 🤮), operating system (e.g. Android)), configuration (set to connect to a network), and credentials (WiFi password if needed, WiFi network name).

So if your Internet traffic (i.e. the stuff you send and receive to others) goes across the ocean, it might go through cables laid on the ocean floor.

Counterpoint: it’s proof that you had sex 💪

We really should be slowing down and looking at the effects of AI. It has too much potential to fuck everything up to not think about it a bit, especially if recursive self-improvement is on the horizon.

IMO, the notion that AI systems are intelligent in any meaningful capacity is venture capitalist marketing. AI systems are especially capable of pooping out convincing bullshit. Otherwise, these systems are not particularly more dangerous than other machines. In particular, the notion that we are even converging towards AGI is marketing. The focus of criticism should be on the concrete applications of these machines. IMO, statistical learning theory has excellent theoretical backing and lots of practical applications, and the mathematics is honest (if complicated) about the limitations of the field. The statistical learning community is still working on developing the theoretical backbone for LLM systems at scale.

IMO, the main issue is that capitalists are wrecking our environment, stealing all our private information, and stealing our tax dollars to build systems that are then used to kill, oppress, harass, demean, and propagandize the working class. Again, AI technologies are especially capable at helping the worst monsters in all of history achieve these goals. But it’s not because of “intelligence”. It’s because of what they are using these systems to do to us.

I.e., we should absolutely scale down AI system deployment to a sustainable level, and we should burn anyone who uses AI systems for oppression … but people who are organically interested in statistical learning systems should at least be allowed to continue research into the mathematics of “AI” (preferably under a different title, because people who end up using AI do not need nor want intelligent systems, just useful ones!) as long as they’re not doing anything with the technology to oppress people.

Until the vast majority go out and become their own personal Luigi Mangione, nothing will get done.

I love the fire, and there’s definitely gonna be a need for some more Luigi’s to carry out those exceptional tasks that don’t benefit from “too many cooks”, but IMO we need the proletarian majority to organize and collaborate to overthrow the system. So we don’t necessarily need a majority of people to actually go out and fight (but we do definitely need some!); we need a majority to collaborate with a sufficient number of people who do carry out violent actions for proletarian emancipation.

I’ll take them seriously when they take their own advice seriously and pause their operations.

0

Thank you, replaceable fascist #69420, for providing the Fediverse with yet another free public toilet 🖕