That’s not OP’s point. The point is they are clearly getting rid of the guy for telling them their AI plans are dumb. I’ve seen it before. If you see a leader get dismissed or resign right as there is a big policy shift that’s what’s going on internally.

Yeah and “fuckening” is clearly his attempt to bandwagon on “enshittification.”

“Oh so catchy phrases need swear words in them now, I’ll use the sweariest word and have the catchiest phrase!”

AI Doomerism is AI boosterism.

No, LGPL just allows linking to differently-licensed software.

Basically linking copies some code from the library into the program that uses it, making any linked software a derivative work.

Sellers of proprietary software libraries give permission for this specific type of linking in their license. LGPL gives the same permission to people who are otherwise following the GPL. LGPL used to be called the “library-GPL” because it is the GPL plus permission to use the library linking mechanism.

Sure the parts I needed weren’t available. Which is probably the problem with these iFixit scores. They should really wait for the laptop to be a few years old and then look and see if the stuff that’s actually breaking on the laptop are actually repairable with the parts available.

For this particular laptop even though it had a really good iFixit score, I couldn’t even buy a new touchpoint nub (or whatever HP calls it). The old one completely disintegrated but the nub was different than other HP laptops, so the ones I tried to buy (even for other elitebooks) wouldn’t fit. The nub the laptop needed simply wasn’t available anywhere.

I once bought a HP Elitebook on the basis of a very good repairability score from iFixit. It was a shit laptop but the big problem was that as it started breaking I found it impossible to find parts for it. It doesn’t matter if it’s held together by torx screws with no glue if you can’t actually get any parts.