I dont see how the second cert that goes to the site is useful if it isnt still associated with the first, but I also wouldnt trust the state to abide by an untraceable standard to begin with because identifying individuals by their accounts is in their interest.
I get where the enthusiasm for cryptography is coming from, but I think it’s misplaced.
A state issuing a cert file has to be able to verify that it goes to the intended person. The state would have to know the ID of the person they’re issuing it to, otherwise it wouldn’t function as intended. Similar to blockchain wallets - they are anonymous all the way up to the point of fiat exchange, where most state actors can still end up ID’ing wallet owners.
Even if you try obscuring that information via encryption, it still gets signed by a ‘trusted’ authority at the end of the chain.
Even in theory this is a shit idea.
The problem is that it’s stored outside of your control and accessible without your consent. This system addresses those issues.
Sorry, I just don’t agree with this, either. It isn’t just that it’s a third party, it’s that verification necessarily ties your device to your personal identity at all. No matter how you store the actual identity data, there needs to be an identifier associated with every device/account. I’d be fine if the OS just asked for my age and didn’t verify it with my state-issued ID - but if there’s any cross-checking involved that’s a dealbreaker.
If there were any possibility that a state actor had interest in identifying my personal identity of this account, and there was a record that pointed to my name, SSN, or other unique personal identifiers, i’d be absolutely fucked. There are really good reasons not to want social media accounts tied to real, verifiable identities - even if you think social media should be limited to adults (i’m not on willing to concede this, for what it’s worth).
It doesn’t matter if the data is stored on your local device - if it’s being verified by a state authority at all, that’s a huge problem.
The problem isnt just that the third party can abuse their access to your information, it’s that it is digitally stored and certifiable at all
The most secure data providers in the world have all basically had data breaches by now - including the IRS and US government. There is no party that can guarantee data security, even if they themselves are benevolent.
And for what purpose are we willing to gut privacy online? So it’s marginally more difficult for minors to obtain porn?
GTFO. De-anonymization has always been the goal, not ‘protecting the children’.
People can have room for more than one opinion at the same time
Apparently not.
“Why are people eager to litigate this incident?”
nobody stans […] abusers
Yes, that’s the motivation i’m pointing to.
I would actually really like for someone from Hasan’s followers to try to explain why this post is not factually solid
To what end? Honestly - setting aside the forensic analysis you’ve compiled for a second - what’s the point of spending so much time on litigating the details of this interaction?
Anyone who watches this person regularly aren’t going to judge his character on the one clip - that’s probably why you feel so frustrated by their ambivalence. Let alone the spurious conclusions you’re so eager to draw from it.
Which claim? That his dog wears a shock collar? That he used it during a stream? Or that (granting the two previous claims) this stands as evidence that he abuses his dog?
I’m far more interested in why some people are so eager to litigate a political commentator’s relationship with his dog when the bulk of his commentary is pointed at western-backed genocidal apartheid states.
I haven’t spent a single comment debunking anything in this story.
It also doesn’t make the conclusion of abuse any less spurious.
You should know that this guy is a Palestinian genocide denier.
I had my energy company remove their LVTC smart meter this week after they started using it to shut off our condenser unit during our 100 degree days
The fact that it exists at all is bad enough, but they were doing this at a time when our AC was already malfunctioning due to low refrigerant. On the day they first shut it off, our house reached 94 degrees.
The program that the previous owner signed up for that enabled them to do this gave them a fucking two dollar a month discount.
I use a smart thermostat to optimize my home conditioning - having a second meter fucking with my schedule ends up making us all miserable. Energy providers need to stop fucking around and just build out their infrastructure to handle worst case peak loads, and enable customers to install solar to reduce peak loading to begin with.
The other thing that kills me about this is that our provider administers our city’s solar electric subsidy program themselves. When i had them come out to give us a quote, they inflated their price by more than 100% because they knew what our electricity bill was. All they did was take our average monthly bill and multiplied it by the repayment period. I could have been providing them more energy to the grid at their peak load if they hadn’t tried scamming me.
FUCK private energy providers.
I find myself wondering just how complicated TVS could actually be before it’s no longer possible to hijack the display signal that’s fed to the display
Unlike with cars, TVS seem simple enough that a sufficiently motivated novice could modify a cheap TV to circumvent these bullshit features. If they ever started requiring internet connections to start or use these, i think enough people would be bothered by it that there would probably be a secondary market of modified hardware
As with most enshitifications, the question will ultimately be one of complacency of the average consumer.