AFAIK California doesn’t require a license for ebikes.
Melllvar
Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!
- 2 Posts
- 54 Comments
It is a theory to explain how genie knows about things like automobiles and 20th century movie stars. It posits that these are only anachronisms if the story is set in the past, as commonly assumed. But setting it in the far distant future eliminates the problem. It also explains the apparent “magic” in the world as remnants of a fallen high-tech civilization.
Rajah the tiger? Genetic engineered. Magic carpet? Hover tech. Buried stop signs (video game only)? Ancient relic. It’s really quite surprising how well this theory fits.
Throw in the fan theory that Disney’s version takes place thousands of years in the future.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Star Trek Social Club@startrek.website•Let's discuss tng episode "Allegiance" (s3e18)English
0·2 days agoThey also put children on the ship, so maybe the admiralty isn’t so smart.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Star Trek Social Club@startrek.website•Let's discuss tng episode "Allegiance" (s3e18)English
0·2 days agoOn the other hand, the few things they do know about him includes that he disobeyed orders cancelling the Farpoint mission, declared red alert in drydock, and that he has conversations with letters of the alphabet.
You mean like… speaking to someone in the same room? While they’re looking at you? With their eyes?!
Goofy at the bottom
From the phrasing and context, I was expecting something else when I clicked.
Found the original panel, can’t find the whole comic.
NSFW obviously.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Guess there is always a downsideEnglish
13·2 days agoDon’t forget the Snake game.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Star Trek Social Club@startrek.website•Let's discuss tng episode "Allegiance" (s3e18)English
0·3 days agoThe thing that gets me about this episode is how it compares to All Good Things.
In AGT there’s a scene where Picard is in the past on the bridge and he’s ordering them into the anomaly, an act which seriously threatens to destroy the ship, and for which he gives no good reason. The crew reasonably objects, and Picard launches into an unpersuasive and platitudinal speech about how awesome the crew is. And the crew goes along with it.
Contrast this with the scene in Allegiance where “Picard” orders them into the anomaly, an act which seriously threatens to destroy the ship and for which he gives no good reason. “Picard” assures them with an unpersuasive and platitudinal speech. And the crew mutinies.
While it’s true that in Allegiance the crew were already suspicious, it’s also true that in the AGT scene the crew didn’t know Picard well enough to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Y'all ever have intrusive thoughts about accidentally dropping stuff in storm drains? (particulary when you have your phone out) And like if that happens, wtf is someone supposed to do?English
0·7 days agoAssuming it survives the fall to the bottom of the elevator shaft, the building management should be able to retrieve it for you.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Star Trek Social Club@startrek.website•I wanna talk about replicatorsEnglish
0·8 days agoNot all replicators are created equally.
Starfleet standard-issue food replicators won’t produce unhealthy foods, true alcohol, etc. If you ask for a hot fudge sundae you’ll get something that resembles a hot fudge sundae, but which has the nutritional value of a balanced meal. If you ask for whiskey, you’ll get synthehol. The psychological impact (sugar high, intoxication, tryptophan sleepiness, etc.) of replicated food is muted or absent compared to the real thing.
That’s why people go to places like Quark’s. His replicators produce real food and real booze, with all the psychological effects that come with them.
“Expressed greater intent to commit rape”
I would really like to know how they measured this. I get the feeling that the men being studied didn’t come out and state, “yes, I have a greater intent to rape” on a survey or something. The researchers must have been using something as a proxy for “intent to rape”.
I’d also like to see the stats for how many of the men have actually raped someone. For example, if 86% are rated as “more likely to rape” after watching porn, but 99.9% don’t rape anyone, then that would suggest there is no correlation between porn and rape.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Keeping it classy for my 1000th postEnglish
4·13 days agoAccording to my extensive 30 seconds of research, the difference is that a sauce is an integral ingredient, but a condiment is added after the dish is served. In which case, ketchup can be either or both, even in the same dish.
Melllvar@startrek.websiteto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's your favourite non-English cuss word?English
0·13 days agoMerde
Parent: Say “dad”
Baby: “Dad”
Don’t leave us hanging. Who won the argument?
Our savior!








Your nervous system has finite bandwidth. The extra movement and sensation signals drown out the “need to pee” signal, making it seem less urgent. It’s also why we rub the area around minor injuries to relieve pain.