daikiki
- 1 Post
- 6 Comments
daikiki@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•The return of supersonic flight hinges on the race to solve one big hurdle | CNNEnglish
291·2 months agoThat one big hurdle is “What’s the fucking point”? The number of people who need to get halfway around the world six hours faster and who are willing to pay ten times as much for the privilege is vanishingly small, and frankly, that’s not a problem that needs solving.
I mean Boeing can’t even build subsonic airplanes any more and Airbus. . .well, they have “Bus” in their name. Who needs a supersonic bus?
Pros of MoCA:
-Easy to implement
-Don’t have to run new lines
-Reliable
-Up to 2.5gbps
Cons:
-Each run needs an moderately expensive adapter on either side, which also needs power
-Cable management at the endpoints can get messy
If you have one or two endpoints where you can tuck away some boxes, MoCA’s probably fine. If you want to wire up every room in your house, buy a roll of cat-6 and bite the bullet
daikiki@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•We Sued ICE to Get Its Spyware Contract. The Agency Is Redacting Essentially EverythingEnglish
635·4 months agoThere’s no legitimate reason for ICE to withhold information from the public. There’s no legitimate reason for any government agency to withhold information from the public. You can’t have a legitimate government if the government is allowed to keep secrets from the populace. This is like baseline shit. We can’t even start arguing about left and right until we agree that the people in power can’t keep secrets from the people who put them in power.
daikiki@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Asus and Dell announce new mini PCs for Windows 365 | Goodbye local OSEnglish
141·7 months agoIt’s like a Chromebook, but for Windows. Only it doesn’t run Windows. Please buy our garbage.
It’s true though. You also have to be a woman.



You might be able to make it less uneconomical, but air resistance is a bitch. You wanna go twice as fast, you need four times as much power, and now you need a heavier plane to carry all that fuel. Which uses more fuel because of how heavy it is. Diminishing returns kicked in before you even got airborne, and now you’re just throwing thrust at the problem and you’re throwing fuel at the thrust.
Sure, there are some people who don’t give a fuck, and would be willing to expend whatever in fuel and emissions to build a plane that will use as much fuel as a commercial liner that carries hundreds to get six people to Dubai a couple hours faster, but no sane government would allow that kind of plane to be built or even land on their territory because of how plainly awful that math is for everybody not richer than god.
Right?