

Headline seems totally plausible


Headline seems totally plausible


If you’re using encryption you should be good.


Imagine what it looks like now


Wow, that hits a special place in my heart


Ah, okay, so you pull in front of your door got it.
I’m thinking the town still makes it a violation to park in front of someone’s driveway?


There are no driveways, and that truck was digitally added.


Perfection.


Yeah 100%
Like they want nothing to do with you. You’d think the CEO would not want such a terrible user experience as seen in that article, but…
…something, something, enshittification.


Yeah, I read the article. I get that it’s legit, but at that point the process is so defunct, I wouldn’t even work with a text at all. Just call FedEx directly with your tracking.
Shame on FedEx though. Obviously an atypical case, with an out-of-country delivery, etc. I try to avoid that as much as possible; it’s always a problem in my experience.


Yeah, kinda bizzare. Like you’re okay with one segment of LGBTQ+ but not others.
That’s the problem with anti-LGBTQ+ folks. They want it to be simple, cut and dry, but each person is unique in how they feel inside and out. All you have to do is support the people we love, our friends and neighbors. Don’t try to figure it out for yourself, just be there to support others through their journey.
Why is that so hard? (Rhetorical question of course)


You keep getting phished by links with bpoint.com.au as the domain claiming to be FedEx?


Here’s the video. Click the public comment link to jump directly to public comments, she’s the second to last commenter, and she comes in hot lol.
She seems to be okay with gay men and lesbian women, but draws the line at transgender folks - perhaps because her own child is transgender? Unfortunately she’s missing the bigger picture.


That sounds like a both-sides argument to soften the garbage and lies Trump has perpetuated.
My tolerance for this kind of bullshit has been low lately, so if you’re going to continue this assuming I’m an undercover MAGA just tell me so I can do something better with my time.
Biden was having talks starting in 2021. Needless to say, Iran both refused to agree on terms
The original JCPOA took 18 months to negotiate, and the Iranian elected government (which, yeah, it’s not very powerful but they have one of those) was run by moderates at the time. Trump reneging on the JCPOA helped the hardliners win the next election, and the Iranians of course lost what little trust they had in America for the same reason, so by all means it was going to be harder than the original run. Biden did not do a better job, or even the same quality of job, as Obama. For example you have him refusing to walk back Trump-era escalation requested by Netanyahu and reneging on his own word to back up Israel. And, of course, he did nothing (or whatever he did wasn’t very successful) to restrain Israel from escalating with Iran in this period, which can’t have helped him earn the Iranians’ trust. In short, he thought he could play hardball when he had to earn back the Iranians’ trust that his predecessor had squandered.
Both sides!
FTFY


That sounds like a both-sides argument to soften the garbage and lies Trump has perpetuated.
Biden was having talks starting in 2021. Needless to say, Iran both refused to agree on terms and insisted that talks be held via an intermediary, even though Washington was willing to negotiate directly with Iran, slowing negotiations further.
That’s a far cry from Biden “slow-walking.”
That’s just half and half with extra steps


Well, listen - we need to know the context a little better /s


What if we just say I always forget the code and use the built-in too many tries wipes the data setting?
If you forgot the code can you offer to let them have it? Then you could wipe it remotely?
Trying to understand what would happen if you really forgot the passcode.


Who is this? Tony Stark?
Exactly, because that’s all BS. They’re letting it lose on purpose to test a skill set.
Also, there are already report buttons the user can click to flag incorrect output, why is a human reviewer involved before a flag is made?