If Dems win next election, things will get even worse than they are now. Much, much worse in fact. That’s just the inevitable trajectory capitalism is on. Things would just get worse a bit slower than they would under Trump, at least for the privileged labor aristocracy in the imperial core. The evil empire would simply be run into the ground by slightly more competent genociders. Revolutionary change is the only way out.

If Dems were in power now, they’d do fascism too. The economic contradictions have simply increased to a point where fascism is necessary for capitalism to remain profitable for the ultra rich.

It means this metastudy is less of a study and more of an advertisement. The outcome of a metastudy depends even more on who does it, especially if they make up the criteria for which research is “good” enough to include.

The navigation, technically. Building a compass and using it.

I mean, exactly half of those are actually true.

This study was funded in part via an unrestricted research grant from the Beef Checkoff, through the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.

Thank you :)

Wow! It really works:

• Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still.
• Of all our human resources, the most precious is the desire to improve.
• The best way to get rid of an enemy is to make a friend.
• He who laughs at himself never runs out of things to laugh at.
• Success lies in the hands of those who wants it.
• Patience is your alley at the moment. Don’t worry!
• It takes less time to do a thing right than it does to explain why you did it wrong.
• I am worth a fortune.
• Do not mistake temptation for opportunity.
• Don’t pursue happiness – create it.
• I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.
• It’s amazing how much good you can do if you don’t care who gets the credit.
• Happiness isn’t an outside job, it’s an inside job.
• Enter unknown territory.
• He who expects no gratitude shall never be disappointed.

The post says “anyone saying that you shouldn’t call a Nazi to those who disagree with you means they are by extension Nazis”

No it doesn’t say that. Maybe you’re not overthinking it enough. I’ll walk through the proof referring to the numbering in the post. The post is saying: "anyone is probably a Nazi(3), who’s saying that you shouldn’t call everyone you disagree with a Nazi(2), if they are saying it in the following special context: they are saying it, even though you didn’t do that at all! Not even remotely. You simply made an obvious statement about real genuine actual Nazis in general being bad(1), but they somehow took offence to what should be the most uncontroversial statement ever(1) and came out and created a strawman to attack you for something you didn’t do(2). Simply because they don’t like the one thing they know about you: that you don’t like Nazis(1). Now why might that be? Well probably because they are a Nazi(3). qed

Now what? Depends

Don’t call everyone you disagree with Hitler, simply because they are named Adolf Hitler and were the leader of the German “Third Reich”, committed genocide and started a world war. So quick with the name calling, really /s (calling things by their true name, that is)

US soldiers in Iraq didn’t just steal with impunity and without any shame, they didn’t just fight an unjust and murderous war against an innocent population based on nothing but lies, they also ran well organized rings for child kidnapping, rape and sexual slavery for twenty years on multiple US bases.

That’s a very mindful observation, thanks!