

I don’t know. I am just asking.


I don’t know. I am just asking.


Now a person might say “why can’t the damn phone companies just give us a gimmie phone with advanced security features we want?!” Well such a thing is possible but it would be a money loser from the drawing board and wouldn’t fit easily into the rubric of phone sales and tie up a shit ton of resources and time.
Why would this idea be a money loser?


True. The flagship thing makes it a bit out of reach for me.


Motorola is only targeting the flagship market for their compatible phones, we’re looking at truly dark days ahead.
What’s wrong with Motorola?


None of my claims have been disproven but only brushed aside by commies.
Whatever you have said about crimes and stuff is plainly laughable. I could blame your parents’ relationship and your birth for those as well. But I do not expect sense from atheists - especially Westerners - anyway.


Your comment really exposes you. You think that a supposed survey from a Russia-based organisation means anything. Have you interacted Azerbaijanis? They have been living pretty good lives as an independent nation with a much better economy. Poland is another case of improved economy.
Now imagine this, if the conditions in Venezuela improve in the future and if US were to occupy Cuba and improve the life conditions there, would you justify US intervention? Why do your language sound like Zionists and Western imperialists when it comes to socialist expansionism.
The atheists were not “oppressive,” and had strong support. laughably false.
Not a single mosque in Uyghuristan has Taraweeh, Eid or Itikaaf during Ramadan. Only randomly people dancing in front of the camera. Since when did mosques become a place for dancing!!


CIA backed factions doesn’t mean they had no right to fight the oppressive atheists. Their claims as Muslims and those of the wider Islamic world is what gives a government legitimacy. Not some Europeanised atheists.
I see you don’t touch the issue of Azerbaijan.
And as for Uyghurs, China’s erasure of their culture happens very sinister way and they always keep tokens to fool fellow atheists. Kind of like how US racists had people like Candace Owens and the likes.


Again, I see you backtracking when actually contested.
Either way, the soviets were invited into Afghanistan by the legitimate government. No. The people didn’t want them. I thought you were against ruling class taking over the people’s will. And then they committed massacres. No word on Azerbaijan.
As for Xinjiang, no, Uyghur peoples are not being murdered by the state. Yes, they are. They are on camera, asking Muslims to report on “problematic” self behaviour. They can’t even greet each other with salaam. And slowly and gradually the Uyghur language is being wiped out.
I see your language somewhat resembles the Western imperialists and Zionists when China is mentioned.
Xinjiang means ‘new land’ - a name not used for Dogu Turkestan until the 19th century.


Both the PRC and Vietnam were rapidly developing prior to increasing marketization, and socialism was not abandoned False. They had to liberalise their economy. Vietnam doesn’t even have tariffs on US goods.
Russification of ethnic minorities was done by the Soviets - unofficially. And you comfortably ignored the case of Azerbaijan and their suppression of religious activities of Muslims in Turkic Central Asia. Not to mention massacres in Afghanistan - a religious society.
As for CCP, then it has been documented that they kill and oppress Muslims in Uyghuristan. I have interacted with Uyghurs. I will trust them more than lying socialists.
The name Xinjiang - meaning new land - itself should ring some bells.


CCP are genuine fascists as well as the Soviets. It is not treason to wish Han people to leave Tibet and Uyghuristan. It is national preservation.


Your last paragraphs again prove my point of China and Vietnam progressing after having liberalised their economies. Of course, they didn’t become US or Singapore. But they had to let go of socialist doctrines.
As for tsarist control, then I have no knowledge of that matter. Notice, how didn’t address Afghanistan and also the invasion of Azerbaijan. You claim that they took national liberation seriously. You mean by attacking the religious institutions of the people they imposed their rule upon? Also, you don’t seem to address the Russification policy of Stalin. The deportation of ethnic minorities like Tatars. Are you serious yourself?
As for China’s suppression of Uyghurs (and Muslims and Christians in general), then there are well known evidences for that. The ban on niqab, entry to places of worship for minors and no religious education is the tip of the iceberg. The practice of Islaam and Uyghur culture, in particular, have been reduced to mere performance for consumption by the Chinese. The Uyghur language is being slowly replaced. CCP handlers have been caught on camera monitoring “problematic” behaviour of Muslims.
Look, I know, that defeat at the hands of the Muslims and Liberals at the end of 1980s traumatised the socialists for generations. However, you don’t deal with trauma by stubbornly refusing to accept the truth. You heal yourself by looking inward and realising that you are a loser.


The soviets did not have any colonies.
Yeah, dude the Turkic peoples of Central Asia were happy with getting Russified.
China did not colonize Tibet nor Xinjiang.
Blatant lie. With the latter China even destroys the religious beliefs and cultural symbols brutally. But lying is a characteristics of atheists.
Vietnam? Here you go: https://youtu.be/GB7qaRNaIr8
Even China did a lot of privatisation.
The expansion of markets was a complement to the socialist system, not a change in system.
This is laughable. Firstly, I didn’t even say that they are wholly liberal. They liberalised their system, indicating that socialism is just an unreal concept. Secondly, even a liberal can make the same excuse with regards to China and Vietnam, by saying that system is a market-based economy with some state control. That actually would be more accurate.


Give it up. Socialism is unnatural and failure. Private property is sweet and love. 😍


The Soviets colonised Turkic lands and invaded Afghanistan. China does the same with Tibet and Uyghuristan. (Not surprised, though. Atheism destroys morality. Might is right to them.)
Soviet collapsed but China and Vietnam flourished economically. The former didn’t liberalise their economy and the latter did.


No; it’s not all peace. It’s about truth and justice.


So, you are just an ignorant idiot who forms opinions on things without studying it? Good for you.


It still is a call to study and join Islaam. I haven’t edited anything.


Huh? what’s your point?


I welcome you to study Islaam to know the purpose of life. https://ia800202.us.archive.org/14/items/SacredFreedom.WesternLiberalistIdeologiesInTheLightOfIslamByHaneef/Sacred-Freedom.pdf
Signal is good. In the meantime, check out Prav.
https://prav.app/