lumen

Not install, but hold. Yes, I do have that right where I live.

I’m not trolling. You just made it illegal to film on beaches!

I’m just illustrating that you can’t draw a line here.

And what if a whale washes up on the shore? Can the local news agency film that?

It’s illogical because you’re being recorded for far more nefarious purposes anyways.

What?

To draw a line between what is and isn’t reasonable is impossible.

That’s unenforceable.

And you’re the second person in this thread who can think. Thank you.

I’ve been threatened with violence twice already in this very thread, in the hypothetical scenario that I would film them. I don’t think Lemmy is for me. Too violent.

You’re projecting. I only want to spy on men.

Thank you. Yeah I got pulled in to this thread a bit too much. It’s just bugging me that multiple people have already said to me that they’d commit physical violence if I would do something legal they’d feel uncomfortable with. Multiple people threatening violence over a simple hypothetical disagreement. It’d be better for me to stop arguing, probably. But it’s hard to let go.

You can’t force people to act on you’re subjective feeling of being uncomfortable. Can’t.

No smart glasses. Alright, then I would wear hidden camera’s in the buttons of my shirt. The point I’m trying to make here, is that this is not a technological debate. It’s about freedoms: having your freedoms means having to respect others’ as well.

That’s a twisted view on the definition of violence… Anyhow, how would you distinguish between people filming for journalistic purposes, people filming and sending it to Meta, and people filming for other reasons? How would you decide who deserves your violence?

Not all limits come from the law, that’s correct. But one doesn’t have to listen to peer pressure. And businesses don’t control the public.

Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?

I agree it can be creepy. But where I live, and in the US, as well as many other countries, you have no expectation of privacy in public. That’s why it’s called public. It might feel right to want to impose some restrictions on public photography, but since there’s absolutely no way to fairly draw a line, it’s better to not impose limits at all.

No? I just don’t think filming in a public place is wrong. Why would it be? No one has been able to provide a reason.

Nice opinion

I don’t appreciate the threat of violence. I won’t surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you.

It’s not strange to want a line drawn somewhere regarding public photography. But I just don’t see how that line ever can be drawn in a fair way.