Well, you did it for your partners experience, but it didn’t need to be. As the choice is yours.

Some people were saying they like it hairy and that you should think about your partner before shaving. I don’t think that’s right.

If we talk the same language and there is the spark of interest, I don’t see why not. non-binary is all about breaking these barriers, correct?

Why are people talking about partners when this is a own body choice? This is creepy.

He is his best fan.

Carnival makes up for it. There’s more beauty to it than it seems at first glance.

Some introverts might think: “It’s just an even larger assembly of people”, but people are allowed to be weird and graceful.

True

Yes. He is a respected male now. He is 23+1, watch out! No one will mess with him as he sexuality is assured (sorry if I’m being too intense about this, I’m brazilian. I’ve noticed it doesn’t make sense to people of other countries in the other commentary)

Viado es veado. Fuck this

Even if it sounded different it wouldn’t make a difference, because language is flexible and undefined, or are we going to take classes on how to talk “e” or “i” as well? I’m certain we need more of those 🙄

Oh yes, my sexuality is protected 🫦

I pay for Ollama Cloud. As for the training of the big models, big companies do it using who-knows-what resources.

I hate that “no health benefits” is added just to compare with the supposed “health benefits” of circumcision, even though I would never like to get rid of my foreskin.

Edit: I’m moderately sure a guy with no foreskin has less pleasure when masturbating than me.

Tool usage is very important. Qwen3.5 (135b) can already do wonderful things on OpenCode.

Military? Who would act militarily against a community? How do you figure slums survive? People could act “militarily” against them. Yet they survive and thrive.

I think it’s important to denote that some people categorize anarchism as a distant dream regime, for convenience of course.

You can see anarchism in action in the punk movement or other community efforts. People building bridges on their own, living in a gridless community, sharing art using their own methods like cassette tapes. That’s all anarchism.

I’m not at the heart of anarchism. I’m not occupying an abandoned building to help the poor, for example. But I’ve read a couple of books on it.

Yes, you’re right. Don’t let anyone tell you how you feel. Doesn’t make it exactly scientific though, even if it’s true.

You’re a woman who wants to “NoFap”?

I think companies are maybe preparing for the Compute as a Service thing, but I don’t think it will work.

Banks, government apps and main apps (Whatsapp, etc.) are on Google Play. It’s clear governments will stick with Google. What is left to know is how seriously democratic governments take civil liberties.

It doesn’t make sense to stay locked into the Mac environment unless the hardware is incredible or you need to develop iOS applications.

Controlling people in the way you mean goes all the way back to “Revolta das Vacinas” and the higienistas. That’s not what I mean. What I mean is digital control over what people do. You think Brazil doesn’t have the US technology to control what people do over the web, but look at all the Amazon and Oracle datacenters that keep appearing on Brazil.

It might not be direct technology transfer, but it is at least licensed to process brazilian info and, if with Bolsonaro, to help the government with direct knowledge against public interest.

CPF, fingerprint, photos,… that’s all well knowledge of fingerprinting the citizen. But what about the digital fingerprint? That could be much larger: what you do, your psychological profile, and what you do on your free time.

Can you imagine; all those companies in contract with the government. Suddenly they have access to your profile and how you respond to everything. I’m not talking directly about the democratic government here, since it doesn’t matter if it is Lula or Bolsonaro on this. But you have to keep in mind that the personal interest, by which I mean the interest of the peoples initiative, association and expression, is defended by the left, not the right.

You’re in for a surprise if you think the government doesn’t want absolute control. In an age where people use their phones, are constantly online. Maybe you will find out there people who “just want to get in peace to their homes”, or “just want to be left alone”, or that the basic for life is “being able to walk carelessly on the streets”. It’s the complete reversal of what is human and what we need to be human: connection, food, water, development.

People need education and knowledge, but more than that, people need the right to build, the right to tinker, the right to find out who they are, the right to find out what’s best for everyone in society and for their own groups, the right to participate democratically.

None of which are guaranteed in Brazil right now, and certainly won’t be with Bolsonaro. Don’t be surprised if Bolsonaro talks trash of the Fediverse or of what the radical left thinks is freedom of expression and association.