I’m tbh. glad we don’t got Karma on the Fediverse.
Voxel
Lemmy account of Voxel, for more information see:
Former account: voxel@feddit.uk
- 2 Posts
- 89 Comments
No sources were provided. 😑
Voxel@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Big Tech Can't Track This Search Engine (SearXNG)English
0·28 天前I think you confuse search engines with AI. Search engines are supposed to index, not “steal”. I also questioned the legality, not what your moral compass is saying.
Voxel@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Big Tech Can't Track This Search Engine (SearXNG)English
0·28 天前Companies like DuckDuckGo, Ecosia, and StartPage pay Bing and Google to use their search index/API to get search results.
DuckDuckGo, Ecosia, and StartPage fund themselves through search advertising.
Brave Search uses its own search index, which they also sell access to, and they fund themselves through search advertising or an optional ad-free premium subscription.
SearXNG scrapes the search results without providing any monetary value to the search engine providers who are offering the service.
Voxel@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Big Tech Can't Track This Search Engine (SearXNG)English
0·29 天前I would much rather not depend on businesses who had manipulate search results in the past. :)
Voxel@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Big Tech Can't Track This Search Engine (SearXNG)English
0·29 天前I’m questioning the legality of SearXNG, as it scrapes results from other search engines without paying, from my understanding.
Voxel@feddit.orgOPto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Fact check: Is Germany really cracking down on free speech and being investigated by the United Nations because of it?English
0·30 天前I appreciate the comment, thank you!
Voxel@feddit.orgOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Fact check: Is Germany really cracking down on free speech and being investigated by the United Nations because of it?English
0·1 个月前Hey there, I appreciate your detailed response!
The focus.de article is by Zitelmann himself (…)
Indeed, that is why I specifically stated: “(…) but was unable to independently verify R. Zitelmann’s claims.” As every other source I could find just repeated statements by him, so I though taking a guest article that is directly by him is the most accurate we can currently find. If there is a press release by the police, or similar I would like to see it.
It’s obviously a comparison of Putin to Hitler and I think any reasonable viewer would conclude that both are portrayed unfavorably. If that’s really what triggered a letter from the police, it’s cause for concern about freedom of expression in Germany.
I also represent the point of view that it was unjustified since it’s clearly satire. I actually was surprised, that it wasn’t about a different law I had in mind. But the comparison Nate has made is still misleading. I now think that including it wasn’t worth it, and that I should’ve rather addressed the Stasi report system comparison Nate has made.
The word “raid” might be a little strong here, but so is “false” when the police actually did show up and seize his tablet because he called a politician an idiot on social media.
Let me make a comparison: If someone break somebody’s leg, and a third party then makes a news coverage where they claim that someone has killed somebody. Would you still say that this is strongly worded? I think it’s a completely false representation of what has happened.
The special rapporteurs is an independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council and are independent of any government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN, Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Quote from the document:
Let me begin by thanking the German Government for the invitation and for facilitating this official country visit.
Voxel@feddit.orgOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Fact check: Is Germany really cracking down on free speech and being investigated by the United Nations because of it?English
0·1 个月前Hey there, I appreciate your detailed response!
The focus.de article is by Zitelmann himself (…)
Indeed, that is why I specifically stated: “(…) but was unable to independently verify R. Zitelmann’s claims.” As every other source I could find just repeated statements by him, so I though taking a guest article that is directly by him is the most accurate we can currently find. If there is a press release by the police, or similar I would like to see it.
It’s obviously a comparison of Putin to Hitler and I think any reasonable viewer would conclude that both are portrayed unfavorably. If that’s really what triggered a letter from the police, it’s cause for concern about freedom of expression in Germany.
I also represent the point of view that it was unjustified since it’s clearly satire. I actually was surprised, that it wasn’t about a different law I had in mind. But the comparison Nate has made is still misleading. I now think that including it wasn’t worth it, and that I should’ve rather addressed the Stasi report system comparison Nate has made.
The word “raid” might be a little strong here, but so is “false” when the police actually did show up and seize his tablet because he called a politician an idiot on social media.
Let me make a comparison: If someone break somebody’s leg, and a third party then makes a news coverage where they claim that someone has killed somebody. Would you still say that this is strongly worded? I think it’s a completely false representation of what has happened.
The special rapporteurs is an independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council and are independent of any government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN, Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Quote from the document:
Let me begin by thanking the German Government for the invitation and for facilitating this official country visit.
Voxel@feddit.orgOPto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Fact check: Is Germany really cracking down on free speech and being investigated by the United Nations because of it?English
0·1 个月前I apologize, but have you actually read the document by the special rapporteur? One of the primary concerns highlighted wasn’t actually the laws about insults, that seemed to be a rather minor mention, but rather hate speech.
You don’t even make money with this?
Please keep this discussion civil. And yes, I don’t get paid for this type of work.
Simple answer: read the privacy policy from DuckDuckGo. That will hopefully address your concerns.
Both are based on LineageOS and they only support devices that LineageOS doesn’t support based on partnerships with the company of the phone.
Did you check if the Samsung device is officially supported by LineageOS?
https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/
Also, the accurate term is ”Android distribution” the term “Custom ROM” is outdated and technically inaccurate.
Regarding GrapheneOS I would advice you to read the information on the webpage of the installer on the official GOS website, it’s very easy and tells you everything you need to know.
Mailbox; it’s also recommended by PrivacyGuides. Privacy Policy.
I would say that isn’t going to happen, if we don’t stop fighting.
I live in the European Union.
Hi, I checked your profile and it has no history aside this post, I most agree with the other people that seems a bit sketchy, would you mind giving some background info?
My recommendations would be: use normal Firefox if that works for you, install uBlock Origin, enable Strict Tracking Protection in the settings, disable all the telemetry, enable the “AI kill switch” if you do not want any AI (including on-device translations) in your browser.

Didn’t recognize the Patreon link at first, thanks!