

Well, people support it. In the end people are supporting their own doom.


Well, people support it. In the end people are supporting their own doom.


The double moral of people like you is amazing. /s


If you would have read the article, you would know that they go after everyone involved. There is nothing wrong about going after the users, if you use an illegal service to do illegal things, you’re just as guilty as the provider.


I’ve read almost every drama-related post from the official GrapheneOS account since I researched this whole thing.
And they almost NEVER provide sources. The only exceptions I can think of right now were the cases with Rob Braxman and the French newsletter. That’s the only time they actually provided a source.


r/privacy is generally terrible from my experience.


I love it how they don’t provide any proof at all /s, just: “Trust us bro”
Fyi, Mastodon is developed by an European company, so by definition, it’s also a European social network if you chose a fitting instance.


Fyi, those consent banners are illegal in the EU.
You can file a complaint with a data protection authority: https://noyb.eu/en/your-right-lodge-complaint-article-77


It is not a domain registrar, they literally say it in their FAQ.
You do not own the domain then either.


Via a domain which you have to register with even more personal data.
It is 100 requests every 10 seconds
uBlock Origin and uBlock Origin Lite (both browser extensions) have a similar feature :)
A trustworthy VPN provider is your best solution here. Mullvad, IVPN, and ProtonVPN are common recommendations in the community. I would personally recommend against Windscribe; it is privacy-friendly but has had major bugs repeatedly in the past. If you want to go experimental, check out NymVPN and Obscura (Apple platforms only).


I would strongly recommend against it, from a security and data protection perspective due: “No warranties or guarantees of security or updates or even stability! Note that Iceraven Browser includes some unstable code written by Mozilla, with our own added modifications on top, all shipped with the stable version of GeckoView engine. Hence, the browser may contain bugs introduced upstream. Binaries are currently built automatically by our Github release automation. These binaries are signed with a debug key. When we finally publish this somewhere official like F-droid, we will sign the apks with a proper key suitable for public release. Due to the current way we create the releases and sign them, you may not want to rely on such “alpha” quality software as your primary web browser, as it will have bugs. So, use this browser only if you are comfortable with these limitations/potential risks.”
Source: https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser


I just reviewed the page; it’s so messed up. I mean, TOS;DR had issues in the past already, but this breaks it completly.
“Service claims to be GDPR compliant”: 👍 (it isn’t)


You didn’t even understand the context. It’s about a law that already passed as temporarily and is about to run out.
Consider “HERE WeGo”
It does not fit the FOSS philosophy, but is by an European company based in the Netherlands, more privacy-respecting and works for me just as good as Google Maps did.


No, that has changed since almost 3 years.
Source: https://www.waterfox.com/blog/a-new-chapter-for-waterfox/
Please verify before you accidentally spread misinformation.
We might want to encourage people to stop using the term “sideloading” and instead say “installing” because that’s what it is; using a different term for it makes it seem unordinary and unintended.