These kids? My friend, the faces you see are the type of people responsible for KILLING kids. These are all adults with full responsibility for their actions.

Damn. We lost one of those thumbs from the first spykids movie.

I’m all for redemption and rehabilitating. The “too young to know what they were involved in”. The “poverty draft” argument. Etc.

But, all of that relies on those former military or former cops actually realizing what they were a part of and spend the rest of their life speaking out against it and actually working to a restorative justice. If all you do is “feel bad” and have PTSD from killing children.

Unfortunately, when you die being a modern day Nazi, I’m not gonna waste my time thinking or caring about “if” any of those things could have happened. I’m just glad you’re dead and not hurting people anymore.

Ugh, just reminds me of so many awful 2 way stops that should be 4 way stops in my area.

Driving around is so random on whether it’s a 4 way stop, you stop but other road doesn’t, or you go but other road stops.

I live right next to one of the worst ones. Have witnessed literally 4 accidents at it, and almost had a car hit me while walking once. Just blew through the stop sign that’s not very visible when cars are parked there.

Worst part. This whole area is hilly and filled with cars parked on the road. So, if you DO stop on the 2 way stop, you have to inch forward to see, and hope a massive SUV doesn’t come speeding down the hill when you inch long enough to see if it’s safe.

All of this solved by, say it with me, CONSISTENCY. Make everything a 4 way stop. There is nowhere near enough traffic to justify anything else.

I just don’t understand who decides this shit. Recently they decided to add some traffic “circles”. Not roundabouts. Just a little circle in the middle of the old intersection.

Cars don’t slow at all with them though. Our roads are far too wide. Bonus, now they can’t see pedestrians crossing because puting large bushes in the middle of them was apparently a good idea.

Deepseek. Take my data Xi. Please liberate us from our pedophilic ruling class. Please bring us high speed rail. Amen.

Final-final-for-real-FINAL-USETHISONE-5.docx

Isn’t there more to it than that because these are federal agents? Asking.

I’m waiting for the “it’s only a distraction from Epstein” people to be saying this in line to the gas chambers. “These camps are just a distraction from the Epstein files”.

Like, we know. But NOTHING is going to be done about Epstein until the power of the state is seized from the ruling class of pedophile capitalist. So, maybe, you can work with us on getting there first.

The “it’s just a distraction” crowd seems to think that if only we all focused on Epstein than somehow the current systems and powers would provide justice. To me it’s a means to justify their own inaction. A bit of denial that the systems of liberal democracy are not flawed. That we just need “focus” and we can fix it.

They won’t. They never will. They are designed from the ground up to protect every single pedophile in those files. ICE is not a “distraction” from Epstein. It is an EXTENSION of it. The powers of the pedophilic capitalist class are rounding up children dude. What do you think that means?

Edit: Your comment could have been sarcastic. So don’t take my annoyed rant personally. I’m just exhausted with the “it’s just a distraction” crowd.

People are capable of change. But until that change actually occurs we can’t live in a world in which we try to save them at the cost of other good people.

There is a difference between trying to change the average American and remove their reactionary ideas and an ICE agent. We should waste zero effort in caring about “saving” ICE. They are Nazis. And should be treated as such.

We are currently in the “shame” phase of ICE. We have quickly moved passed trying to use the liberal state to fight them. The Democratic party has made it clear they won’t. So now we are in the peaceful protest and shame phase.

When filming them becomes illegal. When insulting them is considered inciting violence. There will be no peaceful means left.

And we have arrived at that all but on paper. When the state declares these too as illegal acts. They will further be emboldened to brutalize us.

It is at that point that no means of resistance will remain that is nonviolent. But unfortunately, I think a lot of Americans won’t realize this until many well intentioned non violent people are slaughtered.

Image analysis. When a video is modified it is often pretty simple to tell if there are inconsistencies from an image captured under real world conditions using a camera lense.

It’s pretty simple to trick the human eye these days. But it’s significantly more difficult to modify a real world videos and perform “in-painting” (the more general term for a face swap) without obvious inconsistencies appearing.

It’s significantly easier to detect these inconsistencies than it is to perform in-painting that doesn’t have these inconsistencies.

It’s not 100% deterministic. But it is enough to conclude that it is more likely than not a digitally modified image/video.

Video is MUCH easier to conclude as fake or real too. Because, unlike an image, the in-painting needs to not only work consistently to real world conditions and match the surroundings throughout, but it also has to match seemlessly and naturally to every single frame one after another.

The specific techniques are usually dependent on the video. But sometimes something as simple as increasing the contrast on an image can really expose that the pixels of an in-painted portion are not behaving how the surrounding pixels are.

If you’re interested I found a journal paper that goes over it. Haven’t read it myself. But will likely after this comment. But just looking at the images in it can give you an idea of what the image analysis would be looking at.

https://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/10/2/42

Edit: I know nothing about the Maxwell video in question. This is just an answer on “how” people can determine if a video or image has been modified.

Yep. That’s my initial comment. Sure is.

Sounds to me like I’m mocking a liberal dude that made up a stupid “lesser evil” premise.

Something he said in the debate I linked in my last comment.

I’m really struggling to see what point you are trying to make at this point.

So, wait, which is it now? I “made up the hypothetical premise” or “I made up the debate of a liberal making up a hypothetical premise?”

Because those are two different things mate. You’ve spent this whole time arguing I made up the 100k vs. 70k premise.

Like, are you not capable of scrolling up? Are you really so unable to admit you misunderstood something that now you’re demanding a link to the debate I was mentioning?

Like, I have it. I’ll look for the exact part of the debate for you. But you’ve literally just changed the entire point you were arguing against.

It’s a two hour long discussion. I’ll find a timestamp for you if it’s that important. But, holy shit, did you just move the goal post just to avoid admitting you misunderstood something. You really just look silly now.

https://youtu.be/0jQ7cob4sLo

Go back and read my original comment that you replied to. I was talking about a “lesser evil voting” liberal debating someone. They made up this scenario of 100k vs. 70k. I am not the one that came up with that stupid hypothetical premise. I was literally mocking it.

You, misread my comment and then defended the made up scenario that I was mocking.

You might want to read a comment twice before you respond to it. Because if you could read my last response and not think “hmmm, did I misunderstand something? He seems to be rejecting his own hypothetical. He’s either really really stupid or maybe I misread something.”

That’s what a normal person with some level of self doubt would do. Just take a second to double check their own assumptions when faced with such a massive contradiction.

It’s what I did when I read your comment just now. Literally checked to see if I had a typo in my original comment or something. Because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt. Nope, I literally even put quotes around the entire premise to make it clear I was quoting the dude from the debate.

You’re the type of person that isn’t even smart enough to question yourself.

Tell me, what is the number that you would change your opinion? 80,000? 90,000? 99,999? Does it only change when the line crosses past 100,00?

Or is the entire premise of the scenario just dumb as fuck?

The entire point is how absolutely brain dead the entire argument is. That was the point of my conclusion “you are just advocating for killing 70,000 people”. It is a rejection of the entire framing that the world works as if it’s a “trolley problem”. It is to reject the false premise the entire argument is built on. It’s to scream and say “who the fuck tied the people to the track!?” Can we stop acting like pulling the lever is the only option? The world is not a fucking trolley problem.

It’s a testament to your complete lack of understanding that you think it’s about “math”.

Judging the performance of a ruling party based on how many people they kill is just an insane premise to begin with. You should reject the opinions of anyone that does that.

That’s the entire point of why I said “you are just advocating for killing 70,000” people. It exposes the true meaning behind what they are arguing for within its material outcomes and reality.

At least it does to anyone that can use their brain. You, well, you can apparently only see the world through the filter in which you have been told to look at it with. That’s why the premise of the 100k or 70k question you accept without even thinking.

It’s only purpose serves to justify that people keep dying from not being able to afford access to healthcare.

There was some “debate” a liberal was having recently. Think it was with Hasan but don’t remember. The usual “lesser evil” bull shit. They were talking about healthcare and saying “well, if 100,000 people die without healthcare under Republicans and only 70,000 die under Democrats. Clearly that’s better”

It’s like, dude, you are just advocating for killing 70,000 people.

Simon doesn’t fuck around.

Trump just reveals the man behind the curtain. Even more so now that he is dementia Don and has no filter.

I can only hope I succeed in raising my kid to be as awesome as this kid.

You think these things are running on Windows? Lol. I don’t think you could get a picture of them all standing at the same time if they were.

I’m not a gun person so maybe I was just fooled by a video. I also probably don’t use the right terms so forgive me.

But it was awhile back; one video I saw of a guy showing how he was clearing the chamber of a pistol. Pulled it back from a full clip and counted each one. He counted 8 (which was expected for the size). Kept clearing it while nothing came out. Asked the viewer “Clear? Nope. Did you notice what’s wrong”?

Pulls the gun back to show the bullet still visually in the chamber.

Apparently it was a pistol with a recall or common issue of not correctly clearing the last round. He had an additional bullet chambered at the start so he counted the clip size but the pistol had 9 rounds initially with one still completely capable of firing at the end.

Like, he literally pulled it back and cleared it like 20 additional times. Bullet still just sitting there at the end.

Will try to find the video.