

Fair enough, and thanks for the straight answer rather than just a downvote. Point taken: I won’t post it to more general communities here. If I share anything again it’ll be somewhere that’s explicitly fine with AI-assisted projects.


Fair enough, and thanks for the straight answer rather than just a downvote. Point taken: I won’t post it to more general communities here. If I share anything again it’ll be somewhere that’s explicitly fine with AI-assisted projects.


Honestly, not at this speed. I can read and fix the code, and I decide what the page checks and how it handles data, but a lot of it was written with an AI assistant. That’s why I said so in the post. If that’s a dealbreaker for you, I get it.


Fair question. The account is new (made it this week), but it’s a real person: I’m the author of the page and said so in the post. I’m not running other accounts here, and I’ll stick around to answer questions or take criticism. If posting your own tool in c/webdev feels off-topic, tell me and I’ll keep it to comments.
Fair question. No, correct matters more. “At this speed” just meant I couldn’t have built it alone in my spare time this fast.
For a page like this, being wrong is the real failure: if it says you’re fine when your WebRTC or time zone is leaking, that’s worse than no page at all. That’s part of why the code is public under MIT: https://github.com/yt1988/who-are-you. If you or anyone spots a check that reports the wrong thing, an issue with your browser and VPN setup is the most useful thing you can send me, and I’ll fix it.