• Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’d be on board if “Sex offender” only included the people that everyone seems to think it includes. However it also includes people who peed in public while drunk, people who turned to prostitution when they fell on hard times, and children who were victims themselves.

    Only thing that will make both sides happy is banning them entirely, which I am 100% in favor of

    (Seriously, though, look up what gets classed as a sexual offence in your area. It’s not just child molestation, and sexual assault.)

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They gonna ban the usage in cinemas, then super markets, then the gyms, then they gonna ban guys to buy them, ban dogs to buy them, ban…

      They gonna “ban” everything else but the glasses selling itself… Can’t touch big corpos you know…

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A completely unenforceable idea driven by moral panic. We’re already seeing plenty of cheap ones on temu, and other more covert types of cameras have been available for years. (Look up pen cameras on Amazon, you’ll look at anyone with a pen in their shirt pocket very differently for the rest of your life)

    Not to mention there’s already open source 3d printed smart glasses. Which means this would no doubt lead to calls for ID checks to buy a 3d printer.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m a complete assault on right to self repair, several states are already trying to force 3d printers to validate what they’re printing with some database. They used guns as the Trojan horse but everyone knew it wouldn’t stay there and soon ip checks would be coming

  • laserm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I would agree only if the responsibility to not carry smart glasses is on the offender only, so vendors wouldn’t have to check their ID, but the perp could be arrested and charged for having them.

  • TWeaK@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Upload your ID for every transaction to prove you’re not a sex offender”.

      • huey_m@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Either we believe in giving people the chance to become functioning citizens of society again or we don’t. I’d argue the “don’t” doesn’t seem to work out too well for the Americans. Europe, meanwhile taking the former attitude, has far better recidivism rates.

  • Embargo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I know it’s a hot-take… But how about we (Earth) ban smart glasses.