This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

    • MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      True, the fediverse isn’t immune from oppressive governments having physical access to its servers or users.

      It does, however, prevent easy worldwide censorship possible with corporate social media, especially those HQed/hosted in SilV.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m waiting for the selfie required logins. Right now, you log into YouTube or anything else with that user base and they want a selfie and a phone number. YouTube even asks for your address. You can skip. For now.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Selfies always read as less secure to me. Possibly problematic on bad days or Halloween.

        Fingerprint or tapping a code makes more sense.

    • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Oh, yeah. Like those memes with selfie logins to unlock a toilet or fridge.

      You log in and then the AI agent will summarize what you’re watching and contact the authorities in case it flags you suspicious? How dystopian!

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    My collection of hoarded media waits eagerly if this forces me to say goodbye to the internet outside of work obligations

    • Arola@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Work is an interesting point. Maybe working with a computer (a till, a barcode scanner, a stock checker, a multimeter) will be the thing that gets people scooped up and compliant first - even if you are using a work device, on a work network, on the business premises. If you want the $10 an hour: “gotta scan your ID, or you can’t activate the wafflegrill”

  • neotheone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Stallman calls this “Service as a Software Substitute” (SaaSS): users operate weak “thin clients” while the real computing happens on someone else’s server. He argues this creates dependence and oppression because users cannot control, inspect, modify, or reliably access the software handling their data. He develops this argument in “What Does That Server Really Serve?” (2010).

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    The Linux exemptions in Cali and Colorado bring up something else if that gets followed on a broader scale: Can’t apps and services just start blocking Linux and start specifically demanding Windows or Mac?

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      My work programs from back when I was in accounting, uh, none of them work on Linux. They haven’t even started working on Linux versions.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      If they can identify it, sure. But OS fingerprinting is not perfect through a browser, and can be tricked pretty readily.

    • Ocelot79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Apps will get your age range from your operating system using an application programming interface (API). In other words, they’ll ask the operating system for your age range and get a response.

      It’s likely. But I don’t know how much of an effort would be for a Linux based OS to have a pre-made token for that kind of thing.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Can’t apps and services just start blocking Linux and start specifically demanding Windows or Mac?

      In principle? Yes. It could become a complete cryptographic attestation chain.

      I don’t think we’re right on the edge of that rn. But years or decades from now? Who TF knows.

          • eremophila@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            The wall is for the rest of the world, the usa had its chance to be decent and chose to be the exact opposite for many decades. Now even with something as revolting as trump, the people still show no sign at all of ever waking up and being decent.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Claudia Sheinbaum suddenly sits up in bed, in a cold sweat

      “¡Mierda! ¡Teníamos con qué pagarlo!”

  • Peacepath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Scaned ID will never be targeted by hackers in order to set up some massive identity fraud, right? Or even if they try, the vibe coded online verification would be so secured that it is impossible for hackers to steal the datas, for once, isn’t it?

    Who could already tell that it would be a massive security breach?

    Future keep so big surprises for us ̂ ̂

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      And I’m sure there’s no chance the info won’t just be sold off to some AI company at the first possible opportunity. Also a reminder that when Musk was doing his DOGE thing they were just dropping into government offices and installing their own servers that do who-knows-what.