• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Its not just PHP, or even just software and digital infrastructure. Most average people would be appalled to get a look behind the curtain of how a great many things they depend on every day are operated once it is not sexy anymore and just fades into the background of the machinery that keeps the lights on and their lives going.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Many industries are this way, people don’t seem to realize it’s only in some cases two or three people in an entire region that are keeping some key peice of equipment going. Like shit even our infrastructure is that now, we used to have people on site everywhere monitoring but now so much is just a guy in an office doing the work of 50 people.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why didn’t we have a meme with these wobbly piles of blocks representing the internet structure having one tiny pillar identified as PHP yet ?

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      1 day ago

      “We have one full-time staff member (that’s me) and 14 mostly ​part-time contractors,” Executive Director Elizabeth Barron of the PHP Foundation said via ⁠email in an interview on Friday. Board members are unpaid volunteers, and funding ​comes from donations and grants.

      Sounds more like she is stretched thin, and pointing out how unsustainable the current model is. Only one person dedicated to maintaining a programming language that ~70% of the internet uses is the perfect example of that xkcd “all modern infrastructure, vs one obscure person who has thanklessly been maintaining a project since 1997” meme.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Maybe the ‘director’ should be helping then?

    Oh, OK. That’s much better 😁

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Facebook rewrote the interpreter, I am not sure why the world didn’t switch to that

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Because Facebook at the time wasn’t openly evil and social medias in general were of a fraction of what they are today,.

          They contributed to react and made it one of the major language for frontend.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because it was targeted at facebook’s unique use case, poorly supported, abd didn’t keep up with upstream changes.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      because it didn’t support the same features and ended up being a fork of the language called hack.

      since it wasnt a replacement and would have required lot of software to be modified or in some cases like wordpress and drupal largely rewritten it never saw wide adoption.

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        How much of that is php fault for not contributing and instead continuing development with one developer instead of a large corporate backed project

        • ✦ TheMarkedArchive ✦@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I see your point, but we shouldn’t allow corporate interests with comedic amount of economic capital to simply take over an entire project through what basically is ye olde EEE tactics.

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          the foundation didn’t exist so that one staff member didn’t exist. the foundation doesn’t direct development either, they sponsor development and otherwise help to fund the project.

          there is not fault either. hhvm was never a php project. they happened in parallel and there was a lot of good feelings at the time and efforts to collaborate. facebook ended up releasing hack lang and the projects drifted apart.

    • UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not sure why the php foundation didn’t look at frankenphp and said yes this will be the software for php9

      NIH i guess

      • neclimdul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        i think this comment misunderstands what frankenphp and the foundation are.

        • its supports php because it is php. its built on top by loading it as a library. it doesnt implement the language so is not and does not want to be a replacement.
        • the foundation doesn’t choose where the language goes. They support development in various ways but language design goes through an rfc process influenced by lots of people.
        • frankenphp does come up in devel mailing list discussions. i think its largely thought it being an external project is a stregth but also closely part of the project.
    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I am not sure why the world didn’t switch to that

      Not invented here syndrome by PHP Foundation and downstream users use whatever the default is.

    • canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Right but that’s a pointless side discussion. English has fucked up grammar and spelling but it’s a major global language. Cope?

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        That number is a bit questionable:

        • It only includes sites where the server-side language can be detected. That’s often easy with PHP because of URLs ending in .php and well-known software like Wordpress which identifies itself in ways that are easy for a crawler to detect.
        • It counts sites, not traffic. There are a lot of Wordpress sites out there which get three visitors a month.
        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          and well-known software like Wordpress

          Sorry, but you’re using the fact that PHP is used by the framework that makes up about 40% of the web on its own as an argument against the claim that PHP might be on as much as 70% of all websites? That’s before you start getting into other platforms like Drupal and MediaWiki, or more general-purpose frameworks like Laravel.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          It only includes sites where the server-side language can be detected. That’s often easy with PHP because of URLs ending in .php and well-known software like Wordpress which identifies itself in ways that are easy for a crawler to detect.

          So there are possibly more PHP sites out there than we realize, because the ones which disguise their URLs are ambiguous

          It counts sites, not traffic. There are a lot of Wordpress sites out there which get three visitors a month.

          You shouldn’t be as concerned with popularity, and much more concerned with attack surface. Your argument certainly can’t be that there are thousands of idle servers out there that should no longer be maintained because no one reads the blog hosted on them?

        • red_tomato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wordpress is still commonly used for e-commerce. You’re probably visiting more PHP sites than you realize.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are you actually though? Because if you were actually wondering this, it wouldn’t take a genius to figure out that you can very easily stop wondering by googling something along the lines of “what websites were downed on account of the recent php vulnerability”. But you clearly haven’t. So why the fuck are you even in this conversation?

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          A large installed base of web apps including giants like Wordpress combined with a desire not to migrate when something is working.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re right. Also, spoken language is much better than written language, let’s get rid of written language as well.