Yes, more or less. It’s a spectrum forced or pressed to the extremes, if it wasn’t, I think a lot of more people would consider themselves somewhat pansexual.
It sounds like you are making the argument that sexuality is nuture, not nature…I am not sure how I feel about that. I suppose it must be both to some and that there would definitely be significantly more gay, lesbian, bi, etc. folks if society didn’t socialize us to be hetero by default.
Yes, more or less. It’s a spectrum forced or pressed to the extremes, if it wasn’t, I think a lot of more people would consider themselves somewhat pansexual.
It sounds like you are making the argument that sexuality is nuture, not nature…I am not sure how I feel about that. I suppose it must be both to some and that there would definitely be significantly more gay, lesbian, bi, etc. folks if society didn’t socialize us to be hetero by default.
I think what they’re getting at is that they think nobody is a perfect 0 on the Kinsey scale.
So not necessarily that heterosexuality is unnatural but rather that strict heterosexuality is?
more or most?
Though not for me personally, I could definitely see that based on the practices of other societies