No where does anyone ever say Jesus’a blood has alcohol in it, except this comic which doesn’t follow any religion. This is a misconstrued line of thinking that only you and OP seem to be stuck on.
Many catholic churches will use whatever liquid is available, it does not, and never had to be wine.
It’s the logical conclusion. If Jesus’ blood has alcohol in it, then it’s alcoholic.
No where does anyone ever say Jesus’a blood has alcohol in it, except this comic which doesn’t follow any religion. This is a misconstrued line of thinking that only you and OP seem to be stuck on.
Many catholic churches will use whatever liquid is available, it does not, and never had to be wine.
I’m not sure what you’re saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus’s blood. Right?
When I have had jesus’s blood, it had alcohol in it.
So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
For instance, any time I had jesus’s blood when I was a catholic, it was always a nice grape flavor.
So yours didn’t have alcohol?
Maybe my priest was a fraud. Or maybe yours? How can we test?