It’s the top comment on all the pop science articles. Can it just officially be a rule? You are all much smarter than I, please help compile a list of known websites that publish explicitly low quality articles, with very little science basis to back up said claims, beyond an extremely shoddy study.

  • Zoot@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This was actually the solution I had in mind. Id be happy to report the articles, if there was an actual rule to point to.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’d go so far as to blacklist individual sites based on a threshold upvote on the top negative post (can be automated), and give a mechanism to undo it, poll perhaps, if people care enough they’ll protect. It will naturally tend to negative, but given 90%(+ these days) of everything is crap -Sturgeon’s law - it should work out.