• harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kinda hard to make male contraceptives. Women are naturally infertile for most of the time not spent actively ovulating. They are permanently infertile during pregnancy, real or synthetic. But men? We’re always churning out swimmers. When that process stops, something has gone very wrong.

    So, artificially induce a naturally occurring phenomenon vs artificially terminate a constant mechanism.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sure. But the demand is here on both sides, not just one.

      Male contraceptives allow men to have reproductive agency beyond condoms and vasectomy, and they can be used in couples where women prefer not to use non-barrier contraception for health reasons or personal reservations.

      • Leg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        My situation right here. Condoms suck, vasectomy is too much, and birth control isn’t on the table. Please give me a pill already.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    …in mice, after massive, cancer-causing doses, probably.

    I’m tired of hearing about this shit. Put it to market or stop talking about it.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah just push it out to public. Just like they did with women’s contraceptives.

  • Takashiro@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Last I heard there were some of these contraceptives moving into clinical trials, the ones with gel in the vas deferens,

    Anyway it is irrelevant for regular people, because it isn’t available and probably won’t be within 5 to 10 years if lucky. Maybe it would be relevant if it had a chance of being available in 1 to 2 years , even then who knows how expensive it would be or how long it would take to be accessible, as in a lot of doctors doing it.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I was about a decade or two ago, but then the news stopped. No idea what’s been going on with it since.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Nah, they’d gladly prevent trans women , who they view as men, from getting gender affirming care. They would try to prevent this on the same grounds of “it’s not natural to mess with people’s hormones”

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    To achieve this, scientists used JQ1, a small molecule inhibitor originally developed to study cancer and inflammatory diseases. While JQ1 is not suitable as a treatment due to neurological side effects, it is known to interfere with a stage of meiosis called prophase 1.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      While JQ1 is not suitable as a treatment due to neurological side effects

      That doesn’t sound very safe.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Should have just used bleach if they don’t care about it actually being a viable treatment. Or, for that matter, we’ve already invented spermicidal foam…

    • zlatiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bruh the cancer lab (prostate cancer out of all things) I worked in as an undergrad was studying JQ1. Couldn’t believe I’d ever hear this drug name again. Really hope this can go somewhere, reversible contraceptive sounds exciting

        • zlatiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m back in cancer research for my current job again. But not in prostate… and more importantly, I’m on the computational side of things instead of experimental now

          Also as to the topic… there were a few people in my undergrad lab who were actively studying JQ1 (back in 2017-18), but I’ve never heard much about the drug after I left. Thanks to you I finally found out why I never heard about it again (neurological side effects) so

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      So the substance isn’t a possible treatment for cancer because of neurological side effects… and their next step is “let’s sell it to guys who aren’t able to use condoms”?

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think the idea is that this particular drug isn’t suitable as birth control, but having identified that this mechanism/biological pathway can work for birth control, they can look for a less toxic compound to achieve the same effect.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        sounds that way to me. I think the thing like always is the title. its something they noticed and now a track to find something that does a similar type of mechanism without the bad side effects.

  • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    They’ve had something similar available for years. It’s a small plastic square about the size of a lego brick. You put it in your shoe and it makes you limp