“White Female Mamdani”?

Seattle mayor Katie Wilson added a BUS LANE.

Daily Mail is pure garbage.

  • frightful5680@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The author might as well join the Fascist Party at this point. Forget dogwhistles, bro bonged the whole structure down. Along with the bell.

  • grandma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why do some people never understand that viable alternatives to cars make life better for drivers too.

    Oh right, it’s because they don’t want to understand.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The GOP’s worst insult was comparing her to the coolest mayor in recent memory. over a bus lane.

    lol

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, Seattle has a more temperate climate than New York City

        And I don’t know if it’s possible to add more bus lanes to NYC

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s just a tactic used to associate politicians on the left in a negative way. The article isn’t for you. It’s for the Fox News boomers.

      I do think that its not working nearly well as it use to in the past. But it’s just the new “AoC” that they have programmed their audience into hating.

      But, it’s really hard to hate Mamdani. Which is why they’ve mostly tried to just stop talking about him in most cases.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Right? Like the worst thing they could say is that she… Fixed the public bus system so it actually functions on time instead of being inconsistent? Like, I don’t get how these people think that’s such a bad thing.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Cause they had an extra lane for their private vehicle and they feel like a service their taxes paid for has been robbed from them to serve people “that haven’t worked hard enough for it.” They worked hard to buy and pay for their car and they feel upset if their ability to use their private vehicle on public infrastructure has been diminished. Despite the fact that cars have been given the vast majority of space and funding for decades. There is also nothing stopping them from using the improved bus service except their preconception that “its for the poors.”

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      In one line I got:

      • She’s comparable to current rockstar mayor

      • She fixed bus service

      • She hersekf uses bus service

      • She noticed a problem and fixed it

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        To give more history about this route, there is a annual “race the 8!” event scheduled by seattle urbanists where people start off on its route and do increasingly outlandish activities on foot while still beating it. Folks have beat it juggling, waling backwards, etc. Katie and her kids participated before she was the mayor, and you guessed it, beat it.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I agree with everything you say until the end. It’s disingenuous to say that residents do not take the highway. It runs through the middle of the city! We all take the damn highway.

          • rainwall@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Ehh, way more residents take or would take that bus then would use that on ramp. Its mainly an ingress point to the freeway for people who commute.

            The ramp isnt even closing, its just being sanely re-routed to not cause such a clusterfuck.

        • Jiral@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          It is not just prioritising car commuters from outside vs locals, it is simply an extremely wasteful use of limited traffic capacity. The bus, not clogged down in traffic, has a way higher capacity than probably even two full car lanes at the highest performance. A bus lane is the only rational thing there. If that makes the highway off ramp redundant because there is no capacity for cars left to justify it, simply tear it down. It is fake capacity anyway if the traffic cannot be supported further down the road and it would even benefit car drivers, as it would remove a clogging point and free up capacity on the highway.

      • bright@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        • She likely could afford a car since she has a mayor’s salary, but wisely chooses to ride the bus because of its many benefits to society
          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Traffic? The worst intersections I’ve seen in the country? The fact that when you get there parking for an hour often costs more than a day pass for the train and bus?

            • NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Easy solution: just drive toward Denny & Stewart then get out of your car. By the time you’re back from whatever you were doing there you may be able to move forward a bit. Free parking!

          • bright@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Right, good article, she could couldn’t then but can now, yet she chooses not to in order to help the lives of regular people

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yes. But the right has basically stopped covering him since he met with Trump and tamed him with charisma.

      So, they basically just bring him up to mean “communist that is going to destroy your city” because that’s where they left it. If they don’t cover him as actual governor then they can keep pretending he’s bad.

  • jackintosh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Bus lanes in my town are so extremely wasteful, they sit empty for 56 minutes every hour (if a bus passes once every 15 minutes). And are maybe sometimes used by taxi’s or the police. That’s it.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      So the buses are running on time, thus offering a viable alternative to cars, and the reduced lane is reversing the induced demand for cars? Based as hell

      Make places for people, not cars

    • rbos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      So emergency vehicles have a priority lane? Betcha that’s saved a few lives.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      So you’re saying a bus, which on average can support a much larger volume of people than cars can, are running consistently on time, and the lanes are also providing routes that allow emergency responders (not just cops, remember that ambulances can use these lanes too) to get to where they’re going without having to wait in traffic as someone dies?

      Not to mention that if the dedicated bus lanes didn’t exist, bus service could be slow/inconsistent enough that all the people riding the bus would just switch back to cars, and now you’ve got way more cars on the road clogging it up again.

      Why would you think this is a problem?

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Wasteful, or extremely efficient? The bus keeps moving. Meanwhile, each of the parked cars sits idle 95% of the day, taking up tons of valuable real estate.

  • rbos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Meanwhile Doug Ford and Ken Sim killing bike lanes to shave 30 seconds off theor personal commutes.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      More like add 2 minutes due to increased congestion and lack of alternatives. All the studies done showed that the bike lanes actually improved travel times in most cases.

      • rbos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah, true. Turns out that bike lanes can move more people in urban environments, and forcing bikes into car lanes will slow everyone down. WHO WOULDA THUNK

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          forcing bikes into car lanes

          Maybe some. But also many former bikes become cars, which is what really adds to congestion.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        AS NJB put it, bike lanes are car infrastructure. People like Doug Ford is just maximising suffering, considering how many of his policies is just to make Toronto worse, it could actually be the real goal.

      • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        But that would require thinking a little more than only about themselves. They are never part of the traffic, they’re special, everyone else are getting in their way.

        • foofiepie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          ‘Everyone else are’ seems to be correct as it’s a plural, but ‘everyone else is’ sounds better.

          Any English teachers around to ask which is correct? The older I get, the less I seem to understand my own language.