• vapordays@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    allow anyone to make up to $999,999,999 after-tax

    way too much

    this highlights EXACTLY one of the problems with “billionaires” discourse, in fact

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Okay fine, I high-balled it. The same point stands, just lower it to a number you find more reasonable. $100M? $10M? I agree that it’s an unnecessary amount of money, but it’s far more manageable than the uncapped free-for-all that it is today.

      Set it too low though and you’ll start to lose support, so make it high enough that even the highest echelons of the upper-middle class know it won’t ever effect them. The point is to target the owner-caste.

      Oh, but a one-time wealth tax of anything over one’s first $billion followed by a net gains cap in the 8 or 9 digits is absolutely reasonable.

      • vapordays@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The point is to target the owner-caste.

        A lot of those are just millionaires or ten millionaires… or hundred thousandaires… I think the way to do this is to build/implement a new model of business and housing ownership, where it is democratically co-owned, co-run, co-managed… instead of everything being owned by capitalist proprietors/workplace dicatators/real estate investors

        Ownership itself has to be democratized not just try to funnel money back down