• unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure the “Yikes” was because the number was obviously not arbitrary and the tech reporter didn’t know that.

      If it were truly an arbitrary number it likely wouldn’t warrant a “yikes.”

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        …what? Lol

        Say the chat size increased to 317. Why would the tech writer say “yikes”? Just because it’s not divisible by 5 or 10?

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The tech writer didn’t say yikes. The first person to post it did, then someone else reposted while keeping the original poster’s reaction.

          • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yeah I see that now. Still a bizarre reaction from the randim tumblr user, but that’s just typical tumblr stuff.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had the same reaction, because someone who doesn’t understand the significance of the number 256 isn’t qualified to be a tech journalist.