I noticed that AI posts tend to get reported so I figured maybe we just make them officially disallowed.

Agree/disagree? Post and tell us why!

  • can@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    I appreciate the detailed response. I want you to know the point I was trying to convey aligns with yours. They are clearly incomparable, of course, I was strictly struggling with wording since the terminology we were used to now commonly refers to other things.

    Edit: also, I make music, and I’m inspired by human artists expressing their experiences, we’re on the same page

    • Artwork@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I see. Thank you, and I appreciate the clarification in response!
      The dear terminology, languages, and misunderstandings… Isn’t that why art exists in the first place, indeed…
      To support the creativity mentioned:

      Obviously, there’s no creativity in AI, and especially in art.

      AI makes no art, and there’s nothing to search for in it, also considering the amount of different people works and effort meatground into digital limited/sampled quantized data. It’s noise.

      There’s no place for a machine in it, otherwise it becomes limited, lacking, and lifeless.
      Art exists for people, us the humans to communicate with each other through time and narrow channels as general languages.

      > “There are always two people in every picture…” ~ Ansel Adams

      Source (AI struggles with true creativity compared to humans, study finds…)