I know I’m not the only one who feels like I’m getting visually assaulted everytime I drive at night. It was bad 10 years ago but now, it seems like headlight manufacturers have a deal with insurance companies and optometrists to make the lights as bright as possible. Is this ever going to stop or is there some kind of race in the headlight industry to see who can reproduce the power of the sun first?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Its (like many things) mostly the us’s fault. A slide away from rules into vibe based everything.

    I remember a long time ago when I was first getting my license you had to pass a headlight test where you parked in a spot and there where painted lines on a wall for both high and low beams. It was how you adjusted your lights and was common in Canada. Now no one even knows what I am talking about. The rules are still there but no one enforces them and most forgot they can even adjust their lights (not sure new cars and trucks can be anymore).

    Manufacturers in North America are now putting their lights so high up on vehicles and use such bright piercing lights on everything that night driving has become a nightmare. The answer to getting blinded is now to out blind others, its madness.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love that people are asking me if I have some kind of visual deficiency when the phenomenon of blinding lights is so common that it’s in the simpsons from 27 years ago lol

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Its gotten to a point that seems impossible, just full clown world. Its gotten to the point that my favorite car to drive at night is my Fiero, because I am so low I am below most of the blinding lights.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And those are “only” halogen. It’s gotten much worse since then. Like you said, a sort of arms race.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The brightness is an issue, but the placement and angle are the bigger problem. Its the slippery slope of following american trends. Years ago Mercedes Benz (I think) put out a car that used IR light and a heads up screen (no visible headlights, just running lights) showing the driver the night landscape without needing to blind everyone. It was banned in the states, no real reason why but the idea went dead.

  • baller_w@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s another way. Adaptive headlights can fix this: https://youtube.com/shorts/AgxVuXC0T44

    You’re not wrong though. Even crappy headlights on taller vehicles seem much brighter to observers. My buddy’s 2005 RAM is proof. When we’re in it, I’d have better luck seeing with a flashlight, but when he’s driving behind my car, it’s like someone’s shining the bat signal into my rear window.

    Also, don’t get me started on people who replace their bulbs with HID or LED bulbs but don’t spend the money on projector headlights. It’s infuriating.

  • kaotic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look up Audi’s Matrix projection headlights. I really want to see more cars incorporating this technology.

  • los0220@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s fucking horrible even here in EU, where I would expect it to be better regulated. Can’t imagine how bad it’s in the US.

    I’ve even seen multiple posts on local subreddits about people buying SUV/crossovers and one of the main reason was being blinded by other SUVs.

    Fucking horrible it should be checked at every MOT, and it sometimes is, but the newer vehicles are exempt from yearly MOTs for some stupid reason.

    • jasoman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I didn’t think about it a the time I bought might but that has been a plus to be fair my are stock. Only had a hand full of people putting on their brights back at me. What you going to do.

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I bought glasses for this very reason. “Night vision” glasses. While the lights are still bright your eyes recover quickly.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do these work? I’m thinking of getting them.

      I wear prescription glasses they need to fit with so trying them is a much bigger investment

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In my experience they help, but they don’t totally fix the problem. I’d still rather have them than not, though. I use fitovers.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll look for that brand. I haven’t had any luck with sunglasses that are supposed to “fit over”, but have been using magnetic clipons sized to fit

          • monotremata@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, the brand on mine is “Solar Shield,” fitover is just a category. I’ve also used some of the “Cocoons,” but those are mostly orange sleep hygiene glasses. Solar Shield are cheaper but I don’t think they make orange ones. Clipons do also work for night driving, I have a pair of those too.

      • STUNT_GRANNY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Polarized lenses, but with a yellow tint instead of black. They work nicely in my experience.

        I’ve seen them for sale at truck stops, some with extra-large frames so they’d fit over your prescription lenses.

    • Unstoppable_Flop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve often considered making an adjustable mirror with a servo on it mounted to the back of the car, so they can blind themselves and feel stupid

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s a strong temptation to wander my neighborhood with a thick piece of wood and “solve” my problem locally

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because it’s the sole responsibility of the owner to repair the car (and sometimes passengers) when it hits a wild animal, and brighter bulbs are an inexpensive preventative measure. And you really can’t replace people.

    Other people complain about the bright lights, but they get real quiet when you say you hit a deer and now you have to pay hundreds you can’t afford to fix your car.

    It’s the same with ad blockers. People say they cost websites money, but as soon as you get ransomware they say that’s on you, you should have used an ad blocker.

    It’s a catch 22. Those who are proactive are painted as the problem by those who won’t help those who aren’t and wind up owing or paying more.

    That’s what we gotta figure out. Otherwise we’ll all just keep talking past each other.

    • AreaSIX @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So basically what someone wrote above: “what’s important is that me and my family and property are safe”. Fantastic way to live in a society with other people.

      Other people complain about the bright lights, but they get real quiet when you say you hit a deer and now you have to pay hundreds you can’t afford to fix your car.

      What are you saying? Why would other people get quiet about what’s bothering them because you have to repair your car? Why is that everybody else’s problem? You are aware that you could slow down at night to avoid hitting wildlife, right? Blinding other innocent people at night is not “being proactive”, and it’s in no way morally comparable to ad blockers. The people being subjected to this aren’t trying to harvest your data to make money on you.

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is why we’re in such a mess now. People have been trained that society sucks and it’s every man for themselves now.

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        So that’s what I’m saying. People are talking past each other, no one is accomplishing anything.

        And yes, the lives of my partner and kids is worth more than your inconvenience. I’m sure your partner and kids are worth more than my inconvenience. That’s just how people are. Maybe you don’t have kids, maybe you have elderly parents you care for. Maybe you’re a lone wolf and you don’t have anybody, but surely you recognise that there are other people with people they love and value over the convenience of others, so the point stands.

        I don’t like bright lights either. But I’m also not donating to some stranger’s GoFundMe because he hit a deer being a nice guy who put your convenience over his safety, and now he’s got a broken leg, smashed fender, thousands in hospital bills, and hundreds in auto repair bills. I’m a nice guy, but I got needs and I also got wants. Does that make me an arsehole? If so, then so be it. The question is, are you donating? You said “why is that everybody else’s problem” implying it isn’t yours. So you aren’t, either. You put the blame on the guy for not driving slower. You’re saying his safety is his problem. Okay, fine. Now you don’t get to judge how he fixes that problem.

        But don’t get me wrong. It’s the Internet, you can say what you want. But talk is cheap. Or as we said in the 1980s, “money talks and bullshit walks.” All we’re doing is walking in circles. I’m not going to convince you and you’re not going to convince me. Therefore, the problem will not get solved, at least not between us. The silver lining there is that it is statistically unlikely that we will ever meet face to face, or on the road.

        It is interesting, however, that you take the opposite position with ad blocking. True, they are not exactly the same thing, but it is a similar situation. And, like headlights, or slowing down, there are multiple solutions. But you passionately defend both sides of a similar argument when the subject changes. That should at least inform you that you are capable of reason, and that you can see that there are valid arguments on both sides. So, if nothing else, maybe you can at least appreciate that we will solve nothing by talking past each other. We’re tilting at windmills.

        There was one moderately useful comment when I made mine: someone mentioned adaptive headlights. What they failed to mention, likely because it would undermine their point, is the cost of adaptive headlights. Ars Technica recently (week or two ago, I’m not gonna go dig for it) had an article about adaptive headlights. They sound great. They sound like they are the solution. In short, you get extremely bright light when you need it. When you have oncoming traffic, you still get stupidly bright light, but a smart array of LEDs makes sure none are pointing at the oncoming driver. Everything around them is lit up like high noon, but the other driver isn’t inconvenienced. That sounds awesome, but it’s also prohibitively expensive. The good thing is, cars will have this standard in a decade or so. Just like things like power windows and locks, power steering, and automatic transmissions became standard, so too will this. Then people will look back and call us savages.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          the lives of my partner and kids is worth more than your inconvenience.

          But not worth more than your inconvenience or you’d just slow down when you can’t see as well.

  • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A huge number of people are unaware that headlights must be aimed. Some are not adjusted by the manufacturer or dealer before sale (Tesla, Toyota). Sometimes a large enough pothole or going over a speed bump too fast will knock alignment off.

    Couple this with American police driving primarily SUV’s (higher up, less bothered) and no longer issuing “fix-it” tickets unless using headlights as an excuse to pull over minorities, and we wind up with tons of issues. Feed the prison system- Don’t waste time making the roads safer!

    Lawmakers are increasingly separated from those they are elected or appointed to represent by heightened economic status, and are not affected by issues that plague everyday citizens. No longer are they accountable to their constituents- Money drives their political aims.

    As a frequent night driver, I often see people late at night using only the decorative running lights (because they don’t understand the light controls?) or with one or both headlights aimed at the ground just a few feet ahead of their car from hitting a bump or a minor accident. Sometimes one or both headlights will be pointed too high. Other times, drivers have their brights on purposefully because their low beams are burned out, or perhaps for their own benefit.

    It is a complex issue that I can see only getting worse in the future. Social consciousness needs to become a thing in America.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because we decided we hated to have our vehicles inspected. If we still did that these people would get violations.