Many recent studies found coffee is healthy as fuck:

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/9-reasons-why-the-right-amount-of-coffee-is-good-for-you

https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2025/11/431036/coffee-safe-for-a-fib

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/coffee-may-improve-gut-health/

Some folks think it means Starbucks is good. NOPE.

Starbucks isn’t coffee. It’s actually trash:

Real coffee is this:

Also:

  • Tea is also great and healthy. Tea is not addictive.

  • If you drink coffee, avoid it after 11:AM. Seriously.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      as someone from brazil, the whole concept of american gourmet coffee scares me, my grandma puts too much sugar on her coffee but americans are something else

      that aint coffee, thats fucking high caffeine milkshake

      • talos@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You won’t like Vietnamese coffee then. I’m open to it, but in very small amounts. It’s very sweet and they add lots of condensed milk. In the end, it doesn’t really resemble coffee that much.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dude if you can try Colombian coffee, don’t need no gourmet just buy what you can find. I love sello Rojo, it’s less strong than pilão but has more taste.

        As for American coffee, the things I tried when travelling didn’t taste like coffee at all. Everywhere I go that has this American style coffee capsules I have to put 2 expressos to even find the coffee smell, and that’s from a Brazilian that thinks pilão is strong.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Capsules?

          You mean that stupid machine with the pods? Yea, fuck that, its not good. And its expensive per serving.

          Even plain drip coffee is better than that crap if you buy good coffee.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Go sit at a Starbucks with your “just a plain, regular coffee, none of this Frappuccino half-caff double-whip soy latte crap” order. You’ll see plenty of men grabbing the same coffee milkshakes as women. They’re all attracted to it the same way they’re all attracted to milkshakes: for being a tasty drink. The only difference is some men are embarrassed to admit it’s fine to enjoy a Frappuccino. Or a sweet cocktail, for that mater. And yet, if you make a sweet, fruity, caffeine drink but put it in a scary container, suddenly it’s manly to drink Monster, right?

          It’s really not that complicated.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Starbucks sells espresso and Americanos.

    No is is forcing you to go to Starbucks and buy a warm Dairy Queen sundae.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Soook much misinformation… In no particular order:

    • Starbucks is a brand, not any specific beverage or even type of drink. You sound like a boomer saying “a Nintendo”
    • You don’t even try to give a reason for your arbitrary 11 AM cutoff time. Zero sources as well.
    • YSK is for facts, not biased opinions.
    • Almost every coffee shop that sells coffee also sells sweetened and frozen coffee drinks, with similar caloric/sugar content.
    • Your own link clarifies that the right amount of coffee is good for you, an important distinction.
    • Saying Starbucks is not coffee doesn’t make sense, but it’s also blatantly false. Their coffee-based drinks are obviously made with “real coffee” and it’s easily provable. Just like every other coffee shop.
    • There’s no sources for what you say about tea.
    • Saying a brand is trash is 100% opinion. Plenty of people don’t like them, but putting that in the post shows how your prejudiced opinion shouldn’t be listened to.
    • There’s no source for the cherry-picked drink contents.
    • Saying a brand is good or bad is (again) complete opinion, so a conclusion can’t be reached.
    • Opinions aren’t facts. My opinion is your post is shit.
    • chaitae3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree with everything except for this part:

      Almost every coffee shop that sells coffee also sells sweetened and frozen coffee drinks, with similar caloric/sugar content.

      You wouldn’t find another coffee shop in my city that sells anything comparable to the sugar-milk-coffee drinks from Starbucks. An affogato or caffè freddo probably has less than half the amount of sugar. They have pastries that dissolve your enamel within three bites though.

      But to reiterate, wrong community for this post.

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The difference between medicine and poison is the dosage.

      • Your own link clarifies that the right amount of coffee is good for you, an important distinction.
  • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Starbucks intentionally over roasts their beans well past the ideal roasting point. They do this to ensure a consistent flavor across locations, but to me it just tastes like shitty burnt coffee.

    At the end of the day, Starbucks is a coffee chain in name only. Their menu is largely milk-based and many of their products happen to have some coffee in them, so I guess it doesn’t matter too much if the coffee component is sub-par.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They have light roasts. You can order one.

      Maybe go for the blonde instead of the French roast.

      You realize they sell more than one kind of coffee… Right?

      Coffee without cream should be a sin. 😘

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everything here is false equivalency. Starbucks sells regular coffee, it looks just like your AI pics you include, and the calorie count is going to be quite low. Yes, sugary drinks are sugary. You can also get lattes without any syrup in them, and while you can certainly argue that Starbucks beans aren’t the best in the industry, their lattes are pretty similar to lattes at any coffee shop.

    This whole post is like “You shouldn’t go to McDonalds because they have a mcdouble cheeseburger with 1000 calories in it and you could make a salad at home.”

    Also, I’d like to acknowledge that this sub is called “You Should Know”, which to me implies it should be about important educational facts, not opinion pieces.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t like Starbucks, but Mackies have a very solid coffee here.
      Though nothing trumps even cheap beans and a little aeropress or a v60 at home.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fresh-ground beans make SO much of a difference. It doesn’t even matter much how it’s made, slow drip, french press, who cares.

    • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It also says to drink tea, tea is not addictive.

      Some tea contains caffeine, caffeine is addictive, so some teas are addictive.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You should know that there’s vested interest from massive drinks companies to push “caffeine is healthy” while selling caffeinated drinks with unhealthy levels of caffeine.

    All of the “a glass of redwine is healthy”-studies tuned out to be paid for by alcohol companies.

    We know how bad lobbying is.

    So don’t use this as an excuse to drink a half a gallon of energy drinks in the mornings and think it’s positive for your health.

    Ofc I’m not denying some moderate doses of drinks not filled with other shit could be healthy, I’m too lazy to go actually read the study right now.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Breaking news: caffeine is DRUGS people!

      This is not sarcasm; it is a psychoactive stimulant on par with coke and amphetamines. Your heart and kidneys do not know what drug schedules are.

      Enjoy your psychoactive drugs responsibly kids. And remember that enjoying responsibly =/= deluding yourself into thinking they’re healthy.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree.

        But I must point out US drug scheduling is political, not scientific.

        heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote.

        Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.

        The only two actually more dangerous ones there are methaqualone and heroin. But you’d have to be kinda silly to say cannabis is schedule one and cocaine schedule two, that cannabis has “no accepted medical use”. And also strong opiates definitely have accepted medical use.

        War on drugs is bs.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it is a psychoactive stimulant on par with coke

        That’s… only true in the most pedantic of ways. The same kind of comparison would say that a supersonic fighterjet is on par with my inline skates, because both are modes of transport

  • hesh@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    IMO Starbucks drinks are sugary poison, and even their regular black coffee is just not good. Not to mention their questionable ethics.

    • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I buy whole coffee beans from a local roaster but a few times I’ve run out and walked to the Starbucks around the corner to purchase a small package of whole beans.

      When I grind them they seem very oily and almost too soft somehow. That might be normal (I really don’t know) but for whatever reason it gives me heartburn (which I rarely have).

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Starbucks is just poisonous, big time. On top of that, their logo is a pagan goddess (a fertility goddess, oddly enough), which tells you their items are witchcraft.

    For coffee, I hadn’t tried it, but I heard bulletproof coffee is good. To make it “bulletproof”, just add butter and MCT oil to your normal coffee. I tend to drink tea a lot, to be fair.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Erm, not that I’m a fan of Starbucks at all but they absolutely have decent real coffe that has zero sugar in it. Several blends in fact.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s because they burn it. It’s a branding thing. Massive companies demand uniformity in flavor. McDonald’s puts huge amounts of effort into making sure that a big mac in Maine tastes exactly the same as a big mac in LA.

        Coffee beans are unpredictable, though. Beans from the same farm from the same crop can taste different month to month. So to make it uniform they overroast (burn) the beans.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Massive companies demand uniformity in flavor. McDonald’s puts huge amounts of effort into making sure that a big mac in Maine tastes exactly the same as a big mac in LA.

          this is also why in-n-out expanded very slowly for a while. it’s about making sure your supply chain can handle the growth and you can train the employees to keep the culture of the chain.

          when they expanded too fast, their burgers got soggy. they haven’t fixed that.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s ok coffee. It’s like Chikfila - in 1998, when your mall got its first Starbucks, it was head and shoulders above the other options, which were 7/11 and IHOP. However, now that chicken sandwiches are taken seriously, basically everyone who tries beats whatever soggy shit CFA has on offer.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is absolutely coffee, but iwhether its decent is subjective. Both times I went to starbucks it wasn’t much better than gasstation coffee.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I should have qualified - decent as in quality in comparison to the other fast food options. 😄

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          McDonalds coffee is way better, and it’s $1.

          I will never again have Starbucks (and haven’t since about 2010 - its just that bad).

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Starbucks uses local imports. The biggest problem is that they burn the shit out of the beans to normalize it down to the same flavor. So, the big appeal of using locally-sourced beans is wiped away by the way the need for a consistent “flavor”.

      That’s why Starbucks coffee tastes like shit.

      • Bubs12@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The pike roast is the only one that is halfway decent in a pinch. It’s their “light” roast.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, it’s not the worst, but it’s still shit compared to any other light roast. It’s good for Starbucks, but that’s a low bar. They often don’t even have it available (or at least they often didn’t, but I never went often, and I haven’t been to one in many years).

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          ah, i didn’t know it had a name. I always go light or medium, just enough oat milk to change the color, and i’m happy enough at Sbux

      • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They have blonde roasts.

        Wtf are you on about?

        I personally love a good French roast.

        You sound like my stupid cunt of a mom that does coffee enemas. Bitching about the flavor of coffee when her colon doesn’t even have taste buds. Wtf.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah, they’re better than the coffee that’s been sitting all week in the urn in the outreach hall whatever the name is i forget at the church i play music at. that shit’s nasty but free coffee’s free coffee

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Starbucks can eat a giant bag of dicks.

    But you can buy “just coffee” there and even though it tastes like it was filtered through my ass crack, it’s no different than other coffee.