Crikey! This creature does not give non-sequitur answer at all! It seems like he does not indulge in moving the goalposts and mental gymnastics! He is great with counting minimally up to four fingers on his hand, and thinks 800 more billionaires in China is less than 120 more American billionaires in seven years! This bloke should win Nobel Prize and fifty cents for counting one to four on his hand!
You also have not answered my point: what class is the ruling class of China, and what do you believe socialism is?
I’ll follow your definition, creature. It’s nationalisation! Great stuff, mate!
Nice, dehumanization added to ableism, ageism, and racism. Is that a bingo?
Either way, I cannot find any sources corroborating the 800 billionaires number, the data points to there being ~500 total in China. America has more billionaires per capita, with each billionaire having far more wealth on average than Chinese billionaires, and by most studies has more billionaires in total as well despite having a quarter of the population. You haven’t proven anything, even your own Wikipedia link disagreed with you.
Further, this entire conversation was about whether a capitalist state nationalizing is a move towards socialism or not, and I answered definitively that it is not, explaining why. The US Empire nationalizing a part of the AI industry merely puts that under the collective control of the capitalist class, rather than individual capitalists, due to the capitalist dictatorship. If you’re following what I’m saying, then you can understand that the US does not have a working class state, nor is public ownership the principal aspect of its economy.
What are you trying to do? Delegitimize your own points and make people agree with me more?
Crikey! This creature does not give non-sequitur answer at all! It seems like he does not indulge in moving the goalposts and mental gymnastics! He is great with counting minimally up to four fingers on his hand, and thinks 800 more billionaires in China is less than 120 more American billionaires in seven years! This bloke should win Nobel Prize and fifty cents for counting one to four on his hand!
I’ll follow your definition, creature. It’s nationalisation! Great stuff, mate!
Nice, dehumanization added to ableism, ageism, and racism. Is that a bingo?
Either way, I cannot find any sources corroborating the 800 billionaires number, the data points to there being ~500 total in China. America has more billionaires per capita, with each billionaire having far more wealth on average than Chinese billionaires, and by most studies has more billionaires in total as well despite having a quarter of the population. You haven’t proven anything, even your own Wikipedia link disagreed with you.
Further, this entire conversation was about whether a capitalist state nationalizing is a move towards socialism or not, and I answered definitively that it is not, explaining why. The US Empire nationalizing a part of the AI industry merely puts that under the collective control of the capitalist class, rather than individual capitalists, due to the capitalist dictatorship. If you’re following what I’m saying, then you can understand that the US does not have a working class state, nor is public ownership the principal aspect of its economy.
What are you trying to do? Delegitimize your own points and make people agree with me more?