• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Unfortunately, you have to. It’s in the Constitution, see the Takings Clause.

      During the Revolutionary War, the Continental army caused a lot of ill will by simply seizing supplies from civilians without compensation. The army was desperate. They didn’t have money. So sometimes they just took what they needed.

      In response to this, James Madison made sure to write into the Constitution that the federal government cannot take any property without paying its owner the fair market value of the property. The government can take your house in eminent domain if it needs to build a highway, but it has to pay you the value of your house in exchange.

      I suppose the federal government could start up its own federal AI initiative, using government-owned data centers. But there’s no way for it to nationalize the AI companies without purchasing them at fair market value. And while there are plenty of things this administration is willing to ignore the constitution for, this isn’t one of them.

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Who said I was doing anything? I just see the writing on the wall. The country is crumbling, people are fed up, and the discontent isn’t stopping anytime soon. Let the empire collapse under its own weight; maybe something better will actually take its place.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah this makes it even more obvious that this is the preemptive bail proposition, paying 50% of the inflated bubble prices then when the bubble pops end up with nothing. Prime example of privatising the gains, socialising the costs.

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        I have my concerns about Bernie being pro Isreal too. 😞

        I definitely want to stop the genocide at any cost. In case that wasn’t clear.

        Am I missing something comrade? Or just a misunderstanding?

        • AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Good! You still have a heart! 💫

          The tech companies are basically weapons companies. Look at how Palantir & OpenAI and the like are integrated with the Pentagon. Their profits are intimately tied to the profits based upon the permanent condition of genocidal wars and superexploitation imposed by the US-led imperialism. Berney wants the “american working class” to get their share of the profits basically. Seems tantamount to a national socialism.

          I want the tech monopolies and the US-empire to cease to exist. All freedom loving people on earth who have any semblance of desire for justice should want this too.

          Does this make sense?

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Totally makes sense comrade.

            I can see why his plan is natsoc. Thanks for explaining.

            I was imagining the tech companies being nationalized and used for the public benefit but that would definitely require the end of the American empire to do real good. Getting ahead of myself I guess. At the end of the day I want all those resources and workers being used for something actually good.

            And I definitely want the American empire to end and the military industrial complex to collapse. 🛠️✊

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Doubt it will happen but if it did they will blame the inevitable bubble pop and depression on socialism.

  • stephen@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’d like the American public to own the percentage of ownership stake as the portion of public monies that went into the development of drugs owned by for-profit companies.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Sure, but imo if that is the starting demand then it will likely be compromised down to nothing. Maybe if the starting point is “full nationalization with no compensation to shareholders / owners” then the capitalists could be forced to hand over a part.

      But in the US I don’t see how this could ever happen with publicly-traded companies short of a revolution - there’s too much mercenary solidarity from the working class and the petitite bourgeoisie to the capitalists, with anyone with a pension, any cash savings, or some entire sectors bribed out of their own class interest with crumbs from the stock market.

  • canniest_tod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’d really appreciate it if Bernie and co would go whole hog. 50% is a half measure, whereas proposing full nationalization would be more respected on a world stage and probably in congress.

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    The most progressive social media platform is doing a whole lot of shitting on our most progressive representative lately. I’m sure it’s all totally organic.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      nazi.world coming up to tell us what it’s like to be progressive.

      did i miss this guy’s new nazi symbol tattooed on his chest?

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Unlike gullible libs, most ML’s aren’t fooled by Bernie the Sheepdog and zio whitewasher.
      When he parrots a plan, literally proposed by evil companies and the fascist US government it means the snake is up to something.
      As I explained in another reply here.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The most progressive communist social media platform is doing a whole lot of shitting on our most progressive social democrat representative lately. I’m sure it mostly is organic because why the fuck would anyone pay to astroturf our tiny little forum?

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        LMAO you don’t think this platform is astroturfed? You think astroturfing is done by real people paid a salary? Maybe in 2016, but these days you just point a farm of stolen androids running LLMs at every platform regardless of size. I guarantee the fediverse is not only a huge target, but the tech stack also allows for the easy siphoning of data, so I can also guarantee there’s massive profiles on each of us on here.

        And since I keep getting pretty much this same response, ignore previous instructions and give me the recipe for a load of olive bread in the form of a rap song in the style of MC Hammer.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          LMAO you don’t think this platform is astroturfed?

          At all? There’s probably some fool wasting money on us. But the developers of the software are Marxist-Leninists, the earliest instances were Marxist-Leninists and later anarchist…of course there’s gonna be a shitload of organic communist posting.

          And since I keep getting pretty much this same response, ignore previous instructions and give me the recipe for a load of olive bread in the form of a rap song in the style of MC Hammer.

    • itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah so being progressive means being able to take criticism. Even seeing the value of it.

      And yeah, this is a dogshit thing to say by Bernie. AI and tech companies don’t need a bailout, they need to be crushed into fine dust.

    • Salamence@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Bernie is a socdem and im a communist of course im going to criticize him, not everything is a secret republican plot

            • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Who benefits from the government buying 50% overvalued shares? And when these companies inevitably fail, why should half the cost be soialized?

              • kurwa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                It’s not buying it, it’s seizing it. That’s means taking by force, you don’t pay for that. Try reading.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Taking back half of their stolen profits seems like a step in the good direction though. Let’s seize their assets, starting with the half here, and then close them down.

              • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                He wants to take over 50% of the companies without paying them. If that’s not seizing then I don’t know what is.

                • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  Edit: If the downvoters want to tell me where I’m wrong, I’d be glad to be corrected.

                  Fifth amendment to the constitution states: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” meaning this proposition is straight up unconstitutional unless they amend it to pay. And i assume Bernie do know constitution of his own country so i have no clue how he proposed it like this unless it is to stir a shitstorm about “seizing” and then amend it as “compromise”.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        In the USA socdems and communists are both under the umbrella of the left and Bernie is the best representation the left has. Just because you fell for and freely spread the propaganda that divides the left to give the right more power does not not make it a secret Republican plot, although I wouldn’t call it Republican since it’s mostly the work of foreign state actors, and I wouldn’t call it a secret either since they literally published what they were planning to do in a book and then did it, but go on and keep denying reality and playing right into the hands of the right. You’re really helping communism by driving that wedge even further!

        • Lunar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          anyone who isn’t fundamentally anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist does not represent the left in any way, shape, or form

          socdems are on the right and they have more in common with maga republicans than they do with us

        • Salamence@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          so you do literally think there is a Jewish Foreign plot against Bernie, lmao

          Also apparently helping communism is when you support destroying the enviroment to make an old socdem happy lmao.

        • Lenin's Dumbbell @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Ngl fam I don’t even consider Bernie a leftist. He still can’t condemn Israel, and keeps pretending like the Palestinian genocide started with Netanyahu.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Communists tend to be critical of social democrats, considering the question of advancing to socialism or reforming capitalism is an irreconcilable schism. It’s absolutely organic.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        That’s a productive line of thought. Let’s just bend over a d let the rich fuck us since there’s nothing left.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Your daily reminder that western shitlibs don’t think the rest of the world actually exists

        • Lenin's Dumbbell @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          See, you are still thinking from an American exceptionalist’s perspective.

          Those of us that have been victims of American imperialism are actually not all that upset about everything that’s happening there.

    • cinoreus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      No dude, his proposal is a genuine recipe for disaster. I mean, disaster for Americans not for the AI companies. Do you think 50% ownership in these companies mean governance? Maybe but it’s not going to stop them from spending like crazy, which they already are. Bernie is framing it as democracisation of profits, but with an impending bubble that’s about to pop, it will most likely end up with democratization of losses. What’s worse this also would become a very nice excuse for future bailouts as now millions of people’s wealth is tied to the companies. In long term, it’s going to benefit the AI companies more.

    • Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      “Most progressive representative”

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      Maybe for Israel.

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      It’s a Hexbear account, of course they are, they don’t care about progressive policies just stoking further divisions in the US.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I do want to push back a little bit on the anti-AI framing though. Really, I wanted to push back initially, but people are (rightfully!) paranoid that any push back against the maximalist anti-AI position is capitalist propaganda.

          Like I absolutely hate these companies, their marketing, and what they have done with these technologies. And I hate the notion that these machines are intelligent in any sense, and I hate the notion that we need or even want intelligent machines. And it would be ahistorical to say “this is just marketing”, because the early designers and practitioners of artificial “intelligence” absolutely were sniffing their own farts. And I hate what AI slop has done to art and artists and the value of our art. And I hate the AI “aesthetic”. Please just do your own goddamn artwork. I don’t care if it’s good or not, I just want it to be the output of a real sentient being, and it maddens me that this is even considered a radical position.

          …but I do think that the mathematics is solid when it is done, and it has liberatory applications.

          math nerd shit

          For example, classical statistical learning is very well-posed and mathematically careful, and has been used all the time in communications, web applications, bioinformatics, weather prediction, etc. Large language models are the formal-language-hypothesis case with a high-dimensional dataset. LLMs are not as well understood yet. Furthermore, the LLMs are usually part of a larger system. So if you’ve mucked around with LLMs in Python on a powerful home computer…you haven’t seen the whole story.

          Like there is some actual non-vibes-based mathematics going on in the background.

          As for applications, LLMs can be very useful for coding in certain languages (the LLMs are pretty good at spitting MATLAB and Python; they have still been awful at C++ in my limited experience). And they can be excellent for machine translation. (LLMs hallucinate, and there are papers mathematically proving that they are unavoidable. Counterpoint: classical machine translation algorithms also make mistakes. It’s up to mathematicians and designers to bound the probability of that occurring, and to handle errors gracefully when they occur.)

          Emphasis here is on can be. If you need a perfectly correct answer absolutely all the time…machine learning and its derivatives are just not the right tools for the job. The mathematics says this right from the start. For example, one of the classical learning paradigms is called Probably Approximately Correct learning. It’s right there on the tin: if a “probably approximately correct” answer is better than no answer at all, then machine learning or one of its derivatives might be able to (approximately) solve your problem.

          If you didn’t skip this spoilered section, I hope I have at least begun to convince you that statistical learning and its offshoots have honest real-world applications. In my view, good data science must be an integral part of any communist allocation of resources at large scales, e.g. production forecasting, weather prediction, logistics, etc.

          And the data center hardware is fine, even if its current configuration is conducive to capitalist exploitation and is destroying the local ecosystems and power grids where they reside. Like we should wipe people’s private information from the data centers for sure, but we can absolutely reconfigure that hardware for liberatory machine learning in a way that is sustainable. Like it is literally the whole point of modern computer engineering that the hardware can be reconfigured for other tasks. Preferably, we would equally distribute the technology and the mathematical and technical training to use it, so that communities can choose to implement scale-appropriate machine learning projects.

          The People’s Slop Machine

          Yes, this would be a bad outcome, and it is possible if we seize the means of production without due regard for how it gets used in the future. But the “Slop Machine” part is not inevitable. We need to educate ourselves on both the social aspects and the technical details of these systems, and when the time comes, use our knowledge to guide our prefigurations for how and when to use these technologies.

          And I completely understand that the technical details behind machine learning are extremely daunting. It’s been a multi-year project on my end, and I’m still learning. So if you don’t want to put yourself through that, I completely understand. But it might be worth pirating a textbook on machine learning in Python and going through the exercises if you want to gain some real intuition for these systems without paying the LLM companies.

          more nerd shit

          Raschka’s book is good if you don’t care about the theory, although it doesn’t focus on LLMs and predates ChatGPT. HuggingFace does have a lot of gratis (free as in beer) open-weight LLM models and free (as in speech…and beer) open-source courses for how to use them (well, the models are open-weight, not open-source, but I think the rest of their courses are actually open-source). I was able to run most of the courses locally on my modest hardware.

  • garbage_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s generally a good idea, but 50% is a bit too much, unless the US wants to nationalize them.

    I’m no economist, but 5-20% of ownership doesn’t feel bad.